Japanese Evaluated Nuclear Data Library Version 3 Revision-3: JENDL-3.3

Keiichi SHIBATA(Japan Atomic Energy Agency), Toshihiko Kawano(Kyushu University), Tsuneo NAKAGAWA(Japan Atomic Energy Agency), Osamu Iwamoto(Japan Atomic Energy Agency), J. Katakura(Japan Atomic Energy Agency), Tokio Fukahori(Japan Atomic Energy Agency), Satoshi Chiba(Japan Atomic Energy Agency), Akira Hasegawa(Japan Atomic Energy Agency), Tōru Murata(Ebara (Japan)), Hiroyuki Matsunobu(ATA Engineering (United States)), Takaaki Ohsawa(Kindai University), Yutaka Nakajima(Research Organization for Information Science and Technology), Tadashi Yoshida(Vision Engineering (Italy)), Atsushi ZUKERAN(Hitachi (Japan)), Masayoshi Kawai(High Energy Accelerator Research Organization), Mamoru Baba(Tohoku University), Makoto Ishikawa(Ibaraki University), Tetsuo Asami(ATA Engineering (United States)), Takashi Watanabe(Keihin (Japan)), Yukinobu Watanabe(Kyushu University), M. Igashira(Tokyo Institute of Technology), N. Yamamuro(Tokyo Institute of Technology), H. Kitazawa(National Defense Academy of Japan), Naoki Yamano(Sumitomo Rubber Industries (Japan)), Hideki TAKANO(Japan Atomic Energy Agency)
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology
November 1, 2002
Cited by 450

Abstract

Abstract Evaluation for JENDL-3.3 has been performed by considering the accumulated feedback information and various benchmark tests of the previous library JENDL-3.2. The major problems of the JENDL-3.2 data were solved by the new library: overestimation of criticality values for thermal fission reactors was improved by the modifications of fission cross sections and fission neutron spectra for 235U; incorrect energy distributions of secondary neutrons from important heavy nuclides were replaced with statistical model calculations; the inconsistency between elemental and isotopic evaluations was removed for medium-heavy nuclides. Moreover, covariance data were provided for 20 nuclides. The reliability of JENDL-3.3 was investigated by the benchmark analyses on reactor and shielding performances. The results of the analyses indicate that JENDL-3.3 predicts various reactor and shielding characteristics better than JENDL- 3.2. KEYWORDS: JENDL-3.3nuclear dataevaluationreliabilityresonancecross sectionspectrumcovariancebenchmarkcriticalityshielding


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis