Contrast‐enhanced multidetector‐row computed tomography vs. time‐resolved magnetic resonance angiography vs. contrast‐enhanced perfusion MRI: Assessment of treatment response by patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Yoshiharu Ohno(Fujita Health University), Kazuro Sugimura(Kobe University), Nobukazu Aoyama(Kobe University Hospital), Mizuho Nishio(Kobe University), Kenya Murase(The University of Osaka), Takeshi Yoshikawa(Toho University), Sumiaki Matsumoto(Kobe University), Munenobu Nogami(Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation), Keiko Matsumoto(Kagawa University), Hisanobu Koyama(Kobe University)
Cited by 1
Related Papers
Detection of bone metastases in non‐small cell lung cancer patients: Comparison of whole‐body diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), whole‐body MR imaging without and with DWI, whole‐body FDG‐PET/CT, and bone scintigraphy
|Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging|2009|183
Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Pulmonary Nodules with Quantitative First-Pass 320–Detector Row Perfusion CT versus FDG PET/CT
|Radiology|2011|129
Diffusion-Weighted MRI Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT: Performance as Predictors of Tumor Treatment Response and Patient Survival in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemoradiotherapy
|American Journal of Roentgenology|2011|128