Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of 1–3 Oligometastatic tumors (SABR-COMET-3): study protocol for a randomized phase III trial

Robert Olson(Positive Living North), Lindsay Mathews(Positive Living North), Mitchell Liu, Devin Schellenberg, Benjamin Mou(Kelowna General Hospital), Tanya Berrang, Stephen Harrow(Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre), Rohann Correa(London Health Sciences Centre), Vasudeva Bhat(London Health Sciences Centre), Howard Pai, Islam Mohamed(Kelowna General Hospital), Stacy Miller(Positive Living North), Famke L. Schneiders(Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Joanna Laba(London Health Sciences Centre), Derek Wilke(Nova Scotia Cancer Centre), Sashendra Senthi(Alfred Health), Alexander V. Louie(Sunnybrook Health Science Centre), Anand Swaminath(Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Anthony J. Chalmers(University of Glasgow), Stewart Gaede(London Health Sciences Centre), Andrew Warner, Tanja D. de Gruijl(Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Alison L. Allan(London Health Sciences Centre), David A. Palma(London Health Sciences Centre)
BMC Cancer
May 5, 2020
Cited by 122Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Background A recent randomized phase II trial evaluated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in a group of patients with a small burden of oligometastatic disease (mostly with 1–3 metastatic lesions), and found that SABR was associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival and a trend to an overall survival benefit, supporting progression to phase III randomized trials. Methods Two hundred and ninety-seven patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between the control arm (consisting of standard of care [SOC] palliative-intent treatments), and the SABR arm (consisting of SOC treatment + SABR to all sites of known disease). Randomization will be stratified by two factors: histology (prostate, breast, or renal vs. all others), and disease-free interval (defined as time from diagnosis of primary tumor until first detection of the metastases being treated on this trial; divided as ≤2 vs. > 2 years). The primary endpoint is overall survival, and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, cost effectiveness, time to development of new metastatic lesions, quality of life (QoL), and toxicity. Translational endpoints include assessment of circulating tumor cells, cell-free DNA, and tumor tissue as prognostic and predictive markers, including assessment of immunological predictors of response and long-term survival. Discussion This study will provide an assessment of the impact of SABR on survival, QoL, and cost effectiveness to determine if long-term survival can be achieved for selected patients with 1–3 oligometastatic lesions. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03862911 . Date of registration: March 5, 2019,


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis