Spatial and temporal variation in river corridor exchange across a 5th order mountain stream network

Adam S. Ward(Indiana University Bloomington), Steven M. Wondzell(Pacific Northwest Research Station), N. M. Schmadel(United States Geological Survey), Skuyler Herzog(Indiana University Bloomington), Jay P. Zarnetske(Michigan State University), Viktor Baranov(Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M), Phillip Blaen(Forest Research), Nicolai Brekenfeld(University of Birmingham), Rosalie Chu(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Romain Derelle(Genomics (United Kingdom)), Jennifer Drummond(Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes), Jan H. Fleckenstein(Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research), Vanessa Garayburu‐Caruso(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Emily Graham(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), David M. Hannah(University of Birmingham), C. J. Harman(Johns Hopkins University), Jase Hixson(Indiana University Bloomington), Julia L. A. Knapp(ETH Zurich), Stefan Krause(University of Birmingham), Marie J. Kurz(Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research), Jörg Lewendowski(Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), Angang Li(Northwestern University), Eugènia Martı́(Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes), Melinda Miller(Indiana University Bloomington), Alexander M. Milner(University of Birmingham), Kerry Neil(Indiana University Bloomington), Luisa Orsini(Genomics (United Kingdom)), Aaron I. Packman(Northwestern University), Stephen Plont(Virginia Tech), Lupita Renteria(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Kevin Roche(University of Notre Dame), Todd V. Royer(Indiana University Bloomington), Catalina Segura(Oregon State University), James Stegen(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Jason Toyoda(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Jacqueline Hager, Nathan I. Wisnoski(Oregon State University)
Unknown
April 23, 2019
Cited by 6Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract. Although most field and modeling studies of river corridor exchange have been conducted a scales ranging from 10’s to 100’s of meters; results of these studies are used to predict their ecological and hydrological influences at the scale of river networks. Further complicating prediction, exchange are expected to vary with hydrologic forcing and the local geomorphic setting. While we desire predictive power, we lack a complete spatiotemporal relationship relating discharge to the variation in geologic setting and hydrologic forcing that are expected across a river basin. Indeed, Wondzell’s [2011] conceptual model predicts systematic variation in river corridor exchange as a function of (1) variation in discharge over time at a fixed location, (2) variation in discharge with location in the river network, and (3) local geomorphic setting. To test this conceptual model we conducted more than 60 solute tracer studies collected in a synoptic campaign in the 5th order river network of the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest (Oregon, USA). We interpret the data using a series of metrics describing river corridor exchange and solute transport, testing for consistent direction and magnitude of relationships relating these metrics to discharge and local geomorphic setting. We confirmed systematic decrease in river corridor exchange space through the river networks, from headwaters to the larger mainstem. However, we did not find systematic variation with changes in discharge through time, nor with local geomorphic setting. While interpretation of our results are complicated by problems with the analytical methods, they are sufficiently robust for us to conclude that space-for-time and time-for-space substitutions are not appropriate in our study system. Finally, we suggest two strategies that will improve the interpretability of tracer test results and help the hyporheic community develop robust data sets that will enable comparisons across multiple sites and/or discharge conditions.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis