Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Brian A. Nosek(Center for Open Science), Simine Vazire(The University of Melbourne), Anna Dreber(Stockholm School of Economics), Felix D. Schönbrodt(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Melissa Kline Struhl(Center for Open Science), Julia M. Rohrer(Leipzig University), Laura D. Scherer(University of Colorado Denver), Felipe Romero(University of Groningen), Hannah Moshontz(University of Wisconsin–Madison), Michèle B. Nuijten(Tilburg University), Katherine S. Corker(Grand Valley State University), Tom E Hardwicke(The University of Sydney), Aurélien Allard(University of California, Davis), Anne M. Scheel(Eindhoven University of Technology), Joseph Hilgard, Fiona Fidler(The University of Melbourne)
Cited by 107
Related Papers
Thinking Clearly About Correlations and Causation: Graphical Causal Models for Observational Data
|Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science|2018|1k
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
|Annual Review of Psychology|2021|743
Implicit and Explicit Anti-Fat Bias among a Large Sample of Medical Doctors by BMI, Race/Ethnicity and Gender
|PLoS ONE|2012|425
The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology Through a Distributed Collaborative Network
|Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science|2018|389
The Taboo Against Explicit Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Psychology
|Perspectives on Psychological Science|2020|343