US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and European Cystic Fibrosis Society consensus recommendations for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in individuals with cystic fibrosis

R. Andrés Floto(University of Cambridge), Kenneth N. Olivier(National Heart Lung and Blood Institute), Lisa Saiman(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Charles L. Daley(National Jewish Health), Jean‐Louis Herrmann(Inserm), Jerry A. Nick(National Jewish Health), Peadar G. Noone(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Diana Bilton(Royal Brompton Hospital), Paul A. Corris(Freeman Hospital), Ronald L. Gibson(University of Washington), Sarah E. Hempstead(Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice), Karsten Koetz(Sahlgrenska University Hospital), Kathryn A. Sabadosa(Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice), Isabelle Sermet‐Gaudelus(Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades), Alan R Smyth(University of Nottingham), Jakko van Ingen(Radboud University Nijmegen), Richard J. Wallace(The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler), Kevin Winthrop(Oregon Health & Science University), Bruce C. Marshall(Cystic Fibrosis Foundation), Charles Haworth(Papworth Hospital)
Thorax
December 13, 2015
Cited by 469Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous environmental organisms that can cause chronic pulmonary infection, particularly in individuals with pre-existing inflammatory lung disease such as cystic fibrosis (CF). Pulmonary disease caused by NTM has emerged as a major threat to the health of individuals with CF but remains difficult to diagnose and problematic to treat. In response to this challenge, the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) and the European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) convened an expert panel of specialists to develop consensus recommendations for the screening, investigation, diagnosis and management of NTM pulmonary disease in individuals with CF. Nineteen experts were invited to participate in the recommendation development process. Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) methodology and systematic literature reviews were employed to inform draft recommendations. An anonymous voting process was used by the committee to reach consensus. All committee members were asked to rate each statement on a scale of: 0, completely disagree, to 9, completely agree; with 80% or more of scores between 7 and 9 being considered 'good' agreement. Additionally, the committee solicited feedback from the CF communities in the USA and Europe and considered the feedback in the development of the final recommendation statements. Three rounds of voting were conducted to achieve 80% consensus for each recommendation statement. Through this process, we have generated a series of pragmatic, evidence-based recommendations for the screening, investigation, diagnosis and treatment of NTM infection in individuals with CF as an initial step in optimising management for this challenging condition.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis