A proteomic survival predictor for COVID-19 patients in intensive care

Vadim Demichev(University of Cambridge), Pinkus Tober‐Lau(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Tatiana Nazarenko(London Women's Clinic), Oliver Lemke(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Simran Kaur Aulakh(The Francis Crick Institute), Harry J. Whitwell(Imperial College London), Annika Röhl(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Anja Freiwald(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Mirja Mittermaier(Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Łukasz Szyrwiel(The Francis Crick Institute), Daniela Ludwig(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Clara Correia‐Melo(The Francis Crick Institute), Lena J. Lippert(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Elisa T. Helbig(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Paula Stubbemann(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Nadine Olk(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Charlotte Thibeault(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Nana‐Maria Grüning(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Oleg Blyuss(University of Hertfordshire), Spyros I. Vernardis(The Francis Crick Institute), Matthew White(The Francis Crick Institute), Christoph B. Messner(The Francis Crick Institute), Michael Joannidis(Innsbruck Medical University), Thomas Sonnweber(Innsbruck Medical University), Sebastian J. Klein(Innsbruck Medical University), Alex Pizzini(Innsbruck Medical University), Yvonne Wohlfarter(Innsbruck Medical University), Sabina Sahanic(Innsbruck Medical University), Richard Hilbe(Innsbruck Medical University), Benedikt Schaefer(Universität Innsbruck), Sonja Wagner(Universität Innsbruck), Felix Machleidt(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Carmen García(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Christoph Ruwwe‐Glösenkamp(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Tilman Lingscheid(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Laure Bosquillon de Jarcy(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Miriam Stegemann(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Moritz Pfeiffer(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Linda Jürgens(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Sophy Denker(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Daniel Zickler(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Claudia Spies(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Andreas Edel(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Nils B. Müller(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Philipp Enghard(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Aleksej Zelezniak(The Francis Crick Institute), Rosa Bellmann‐Weiler(Innsbruck Medical University), Günter Weiß(Innsbruck Medical University), Archie Campbell(Edinburgh Cancer Research), Caroline Hayward(Institute of Genetics and Cancer), David J. Porteous(Edinburgh Cancer Research), Riccardo E. Marioni(Edinburgh Cancer Research), Alexander Uhrig(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Heinz Zoller(Universität Innsbruck), Judith Löffler‐Ragg(Innsbruck Medical University), Markus A. Keller(Innsbruck Medical University), Ivan Tancevski(Innsbruck Medical University), John F. Timms(London Women's Clinic), Alexey Zaikin(Sechenov University), Stefan Hippenstiel(German Center for Lung Research), Michael Ramharter(Universität Hamburg), Holger Müller-Redetzky(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Martin Witzenrath(German Center for Lung Research), Norbert Suttorp(German Center for Lung Research), Kathryn S. Lilley(University of Cambridge), Michael Mülleder(Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Leif Erik Sander(German Center for Lung Research), PA-COVID-19 Study group(Universität Hamburg), Florian Kurth(Universität Hamburg), Markus Ralser(The Francis Crick Institute)
PLOS Digital Health
January 18, 2022
Cited by 66Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Global healthcare systems are challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a need to optimize allocation of treatment and resources in intensive care, as clinically established risk assessments such as SOFA and APACHE II scores show only limited performance for predicting the survival of severely ill COVID-19 patients. Additional tools are also needed to monitor treatment, including experimental therapies in clinical trials. Comprehensively capturing human physiology, we speculated that proteomics in combination with new data-driven analysis strategies could produce a new generation of prognostic discriminators. We studied two independent cohorts of patients with severe COVID-19 who required intensive care and invasive mechanical ventilation. SOFA score, Charlson comorbidity index, and APACHE II score showed limited performance in predicting the COVID-19 outcome. Instead, the quantification of 321 plasma protein groups at 349 timepoints in 50 critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation revealed 14 proteins that showed trajectories different between survivors and non-survivors. A predictor trained on proteomic measurements obtained at the first time point at maximum treatment level (i.e. WHO grade 7), which was weeks before the outcome, achieved accurate classification of survivors (AUROC 0.81). We tested the established predictor on an independent validation cohort (AUROC 1.0). The majority of proteins with high relevance in the prediction model belong to the coagulation system and complement cascade. Our study demonstrates that plasma proteomics can give rise to prognostic predictors substantially outperforming current prognostic markers in intensive care.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis