Atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with impaired liver function and prior systemic therapy: a real-world experience

Tiago B. R. Castro(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Leonie Jochheim(Essen University Hospital), Melanie Bathon(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Sabrina Welland(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Bernhard Scheiner(Medical University of Vienna), Kateryna Shmanko(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Daniel Roessler(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Najib Ben Khaled(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Matthias Jeschke(Essen University Hospital), Johannes Ludwig(Essen University Hospital), Jens U. Marquardt(University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein), Arndt Weinmann(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Matthias Pinter(Medical University of Vienna), Christian M. Lange(Essen University Hospital), Arndt Vogel(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Anna Saborowski(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover)
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
January 1, 2022
Cited by 79Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab/bevacizumab in a real-world HCC cohort, including patients with impaired liver function and prior systemic therapy. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 147 HCC patients treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab at six sites in Germany and Austria. Results: The overall response rate and disease control rate were 20.4% and 51.7%, respectively. Seventy-three patients (49.7%) met at least one major exclusion criterion of the IMbrave150 trial (IMbrave-OUT), whereas 74 patients (50.3%) were eligible (IMbrave-IN). Median overall survival (mOS) as well as median progression-free survival (mPFS) was significantly longer in IMbrave-IN versus IMbrave-OUT patients [mOS: 15.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 10.7–19.3] versus 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.2–8.9; p < 0.001) and mPFS: 8.7 months (95% CI: 5.9–11.5) versus 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.7–4.7; p < 0.001)]. Prior systemic treatment did not significantly affect mOS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.32 (95% CI: 0.78–2.23; p = 0.305)]. mOS according to ALBI grades 1/2/3 were 15.0 months (95% CI: not estimable), 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.4–11.7), and 3.2 months (95% CI: 0.3–6.1), respectively. ALBI grade and ECOG score were identified as independent prognostic factors [ALBI grade 2 versus 1; HR: 2.40 (95% CI: 1.34 – 4.30; p = 0.003), ALBI grade 3 versus 1; HR: 7.28 (95% CI: 3.30–16.08; p < 0.001), and ECOG ⩾2 versus 0; HR: 2.09 (95% CI: 1.03 – 4.23; p = 0.042)], respectively. Sixty-seven patients (45.6%) experienced an adverse event classified as CTCAE grade ⩾3. Patients in the IMbrave-OUT group were at increased risk of hepatic decompensation with encephalopathy (13.7% versus 1.4%, p = 0.004) and/or ascites (39.7% versus 9.5%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this real-world cohort, efficacy was comparable to the results of the IMbrave150 study and not affected by prior systemic treatment. ALBI grade and ECOG score were independently associated with survival. IMbrave-OUT patients were more likely to experience hepatic decompensation.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis