Tislelizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (RATIONALE-302): A Randomized Phase III Study

Lin Shen(Peking University), Ken Kato(National Cancer Center Hospital East), Sung‐Bae Kim(Ulsan College), Jaffer A. Ajani(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Kuaile Zhao(Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Zhiyong He(Fujian Medical University), Xinmin Yu(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Yongqian Shu(Jiangsu Province Hospital), Qi Luo(First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University), Jufeng Wang(Henan Cancer Hospital), Zhendong Chen(Anhui Medical University), Zuoxing Niu(Shandong Tumor Hospital), Longzhen Zhang(Xuzhou Medical College), Tienan Yi(Xiangyang Central Hospital), Jong‐Mu Sun(Samsung Medical Center), Jianhua Chen(Hunan Cancer Hospital), Guohua Yu(Weifang People's Hospital), Chen‐Yuan Lin(China Medical University), Hiroki Hara(Saitama Cancer Center), Qing Bi, Taroh Satoh(Osaka University Hospital), Roberto Pazo-Cid(Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet), Hendrick-Tobias Arkenau(Sarah Cannon Research Institute), Christophe Borg(Inserm), Florian Lordick(Leipzig University), Liyun Li(BeiGene (China)), Ningning Ding(BeiGene (China)), Aiyang Tao(BeiGene (China)), Jingwen Shi(BeiGene (China)), Eric Van Cutsem(KU Leuven), for the RATIONALE-302 Investigators
Journal of Clinical Oncology
April 20, 2022
Cited by 304Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE Patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have poor prognosis. For these patients, treatment options are limited after first-line systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label phase III clinical study, patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, whose tumor progressed after first-line systemic treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tislelizumab, an anti–programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, 200 mg every 3 weeks or chemotherapy (investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in all patients. The key secondary end point was OS in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 tumor area positivity (TAP) score ≥ 10%. RESULTS In total, 512 patients across 11 countries/regions were randomly assigned. At final analysis, conducted after 410 death events occurred, OS was significantly longer with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in all patients (median, 8.6 v 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.85]; one-sided P = .0001), and in patients with TAP ≥ 10% (median, 10.3 months v 6.8 months; HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.79]; one-sided P = .0006). Survival benefit was consistently observed across all predefined subgroups, including those defined by baseline TAP score, region, and race. Treatment with tislelizumab was associated with higher objective response rate (20.3% v 9.8%) and a more durable antitumor response (median, 7.1 months v 4.0 months) versus chemotherapy in all patients. Fewer patients experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (18.8% v 55.8%) with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Tislelizumab significantly improved OS compared with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with a tolerable safety profile. Patients with programmed death-ligand 1 TAP ≥ 10% also demonstrated statistically significant survival benefit with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis