Radiotherapy combined with nivolumab or temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated <i>MGMT</i> promoter: An international randomized phase III trial

Antonio Omuro(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Alba A. Brandes(Institute of Neurological Sciences), Alain Carpentier(Université Paris Cité), Ahmed Idbaïh(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), David A. Reardon(Harvard University), Timothy F. Cloughesy(University of California, Los Angeles), Ashley Sumrall(Levine Cancer Institute), Joachim M. Baehring(Yale University), Martin J. van den Bent(Erasmus MC), Oliver Bähr(Goethe University Frankfurt), Giuseppe Lombardi(Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Paul Mulholland(University College Hospital), Ghazaleh Tabatabai(Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research), Ulrik Lassen(Rigshospitalet), Juan Manuel Sepúlveda-Sánchez(Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre), Mustafa Khasraw(The University of Sydney), Élodie Vauléon(Centre Eugène Marquis), Yoshihiro Muragaki(Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital), Anna Maria Di Giacomo(University of Siena), Nicholas Butowski(University of California, San Francisco), Patrick Roth(University of Zurich), Xiaozhong Qian(Princeton University), Alex Z. Fu(Princeton University), Yanfang Liu(Princeton University), Von Potter(Princeton University), Alexandros-Georgios Chalamandaris(Princeton University), Kay Tatsuoka(Princeton University), Michael Lim(Johns Hopkins Hospital), Michael Weller(University of Zurich)
Neuro-Oncology
April 14, 2022
Cited by 472Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit. The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared with TMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT + TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily during RT and 150-200 mg/m2/day 5/28 days during maintenance). The primary endpoint was OS. RESULTS: A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) with TMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) with TMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) with TMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade serious TRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use of TMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617589.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis