Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Phenotyping Using Pretreatment Uracil: A Note of Caution Based on a Large Prospective Clinical Study

Mirjam de With(Erasmus MC), Jonathan E. Knikman(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Femke M. de Man(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Carin A.T.C. Lunenburg(Leiden University Medical Center), Linda M. Henricks(Leiden University Medical Center), André B. P. Kuilenburg(Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Jan Gerard Maring(Goudappel Coffeng), Maurice C. van Staveren(Treant Zorggroep), Niels de Vries(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Hilde Rosing(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Jos H. Beijnen(Utrecht University), Dick Pluim(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Anil Modak(International Isotopes (United States)), Alex L.T. Imholz(Deventer Ziekenhuis), Ron H. N. van Schaik(Erasmus MC), Jan H.M. Schellens(Utrecht University), Hans Gelderblom(Leiden University Medical Center), Annemieke Cats(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Henk‐Jan Guchelaar(Leiden University Medical Center), Ron H.J. Mathijssen(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Jesse J. Swen(Leiden University Medical Center), Didier Meulendijks(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom))
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
April 9, 2022
Cited by 56Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

In clinical practice, 25-30% of the patients treated with fluoropyrimidines experience severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. Extensively clinically validated DPYD genotyping tests are available to identify patients at risk of severe toxicity due to decreased activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the rate limiting enzyme in fluoropyrimidine metabolism. In April 2020, the European Medicines Agency recommended that, as an alternative for DPYD genotype-based testing for DPD deficiency, also phenotype testing based on pretreatment plasma uracil levels is a suitable method to identify patients with DPD deficiency. Although the evidence for genotype-directed dosing of fluoropyrimidines is substantial, the level of evidence supporting plasma uracil levels to predict DPD activity in clinical practice is limited. Notwithstanding this, uracil-based phenotyping is now used in clinical practice in various countries in Europe. We aimed to determine the value of pretreatment uracil levels in predicting DPD deficiency and severe treatment-related toxicity. To this end, we determined pretreatment uracil levels in 955 patients with cancer, and assessed the correlation with DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity. We identified substantial issues concerning the use of pretreatment uracil in clinical practice, including large between-center study differences in measured pretreatment uracil levels, most likely as a result of pre-analytical factors. Importantly, we were not able to correlate pretreatment uracil levels with DPD activity nor were uracil levels predictive of severe treatment-related toxicity. We urge that robust clinical validation should first be performed before pretreatment plasma uracil levels are used in clinical practice as part of a dosing strategy for fluoropyrimidines.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis