Neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus Chemotherapy in Resectable Lung Cancer

Patrick M. Forde(Johns Hopkins University), Jonathan Spicer(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Shun Lu(Johns Hopkins University), Mariano Provencio(Johns Hopkins University), Tetsuya Mitsudomi(Johns Hopkins University), Mark M. Awad(Johns Hopkins University), Enriqueta Felip(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Stephen R. Broderick(Johns Hopkins University), Julie R. Brahmer(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Scott J. Swanson(Johns Hopkins University), Keith Kerr(Johns Hopkins University), Changli Wang(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu(Johns Hopkins University), Gene B. Saylors(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Fumihiro Tanaka(Johns Hopkins University), Hiroyuki Ito(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Ke-Neng Chen(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Moishe Liberman(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Everett E. Vokes(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Janis M. Taube(Johns Hopkins University), Cecile Dorange(Johns Hopkins University), Junliang Cai(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Joseph Fiore(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Anthony Jarkowski(Johns Hopkins University), David Balli(Johns Hopkins University), Mark Sausen(Johns Hopkins University), Dimple Pandya(Shanghai Cancer Institute), Christophe Y. Calvet(Johns Hopkins University), Nicolas Girard(Johns Hopkins University)
New England Journal of Medicine
April 11, 2022
Cited by 2,500Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy confers a modest benefit over surgery alone for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In early-phase trials, nivolumab-based neoadjuvant regimens have shown promising clinical activity; however, data from phase 3 trials are needed to confirm these findings. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with stage IB to IIIA resectable NSCLC to receive nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy alone, followed by resection. The primary end points were event-free survival and pathological complete response (0% viable tumor in resected lung and lymph nodes), both evaluated by blinded independent review. Overall survival was a key secondary end point. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. RESULTS: The median event-free survival was 31.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.2 to not reached) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 20.8 months (95% CI, 14.0 to 26.7) with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for disease progression, disease recurrence, or death, 0.63; 97.38% CI, 0.43 to 0.91; P = 0.005). The percentage of patients with a pathological complete response was 24.0% (95% CI, 18.0 to 31.0) and 2.2% (95% CI, 0.6 to 5.6), respectively (odds ratio, 13.94; 99% CI, 3.49 to 55.75; P<0.001). Results for event-free survival and pathological complete response across most subgroups favored nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. At the first prespecified interim analysis, the hazard ratio for death was 0.57 (99.67% CI, 0.30 to 1.07) and did not meet the criterion for significance. Of the patients who underwent randomization, 83.2% of those in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group and 75.4% of those in the chemotherapy-alone group underwent surgery. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33.5% of the patients in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group and in 36.9% of those in the chemotherapy-alone group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer event-free survival and a higher percentage of patients with a pathological complete response than chemotherapy alone. The addition of nivolumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase the incidence of adverse events or impede the feasibility of surgery. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; CheckMate 816 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02998528.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis