Liquid biopsies to monitor and direct cancer treatment in colorectal cancer

Gianluca Mauri(University of Milan), Pietro Paolo Vitiello(Candiolo Cancer Institute), Alberto Sogari(Candiolo Cancer Institute), Giovanni Crisafulli(Candiolo Cancer Institute), Andrea Sartore‐Bianchi(University of Milan), Silvia Marsoni(IFOM), Salvatore Siena(University of Milan), Alberto Bardelli(Candiolo Cancer Institute)
British Journal of Cancer
March 9, 2022
Cited by 94Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent and deadly cancers worldwide. Despite recent improvements in treatment and prevention, most of the current therapeutic options are weighted by side effects impacting patients' quality of life. Better patient selection towards systemic treatments represents an unmet clinical need. The recent multidisciplinary and molecular advancements in the treatment of CRC patients demand the identification of efficient biomarkers allowing to personalise patient care. Currently, core tumour biopsy specimens represent the gold-standard biological tissue to identify such biomarkers. However, technical feasibility, tumour heterogeneity and cancer evolution are major limitations of this single-snapshot approach. Genotyping circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has been addressed as potentially overcoming such limitations. Indeed, ctDNA has been retrospectively demonstrated capable of identifying minimal residual disease post-surgery and post-adjuvant treatment, as well as spotting druggable molecular alterations for tailoring treatments in metastatic disease. In this review, we summarise the available evidence on ctDNA applicability in CRC. Then, we review ongoing clinical trials assessing how liquid biopsy can be used interventionally to guide therapeutic choice in localised, locally advanced and metastatic CRC. Finally, we discuss how its widespread could transform CRC patients' management, dissecting its limitations while suggesting improvement strategies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis