SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank

Gwenaëlle Douaud(University of Oxford), Soojin Lee(University of Oxford), Fidel Alfaro‐Almagro(University of Oxford), Christoph Arthofer(University of Oxford), Chaoyue Wang(University of Oxford), Paul J. McCarthy(University of Oxford), Frederik Lange(University of Oxford), Jesper Andersson(University of Oxford), Ludovica Griffanti(University of Oxford), Eugene Duff(University of Oxford), Saâd Jbabdi(University of Oxford), Bernd Taschler(University of Oxford), Peter Keating(University College London), Anderson M. Winkler(National Institutes of Health), Rory Collins(University of Oxford), Paul M. Matthews(UK Dementia Research Institute), Naomi E. Allen(University of Oxford), Karla L. Miller(University of Oxford), Thomas E. Nichols(Open Data Institute), Stephen M. Smith(University of Oxford)
Nature
March 7, 2022
Cited by 1,534Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

. However, it remains unknown whether the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection can be detected in milder cases, and whether this can reveal possible mechanisms contributing to brain pathology. Here we investigated brain changes in 785 participants of UK Biobank (aged 51-81 years) who were imaged twice using magnetic resonance imaging, including 401 cases who tested positive for infection with SARS-CoV-2 between their two scans-with 141 days on average separating their diagnosis and the second scan-as well as 384 controls. The availability of pre-infection imaging data reduces the likelihood of pre-existing risk factors being misinterpreted as disease effects. We identified significant longitudinal effects when comparing the two groups, including (1) a greater reduction in grey matter thickness and tissue contrast in the orbitofrontal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus; (2) greater changes in markers of tissue damage in regions that are functionally connected to the primary olfactory cortex; and (3) a greater reduction in global brain size in the SARS-CoV-2 cases. The participants who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 also showed on average a greater cognitive decline between the two time points. Importantly, these imaging and cognitive longitudinal effects were still observed after excluding the 15 patients who had been hospitalised. These mainly limbic brain imaging results may be the in vivo hallmarks of a degenerative spread of the disease through olfactory pathways, of neuroinflammatory events, or of the loss of sensory input due to anosmia. Whether this deleterious effect can be partially reversed, or whether these effects will persist in the long term, remains to be investigated with additional follow-up.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis