Possible bias in the assessment of karst hydrological model performance. Example of alpha and beta parameters compensation when using the KGE as performance criterion.
Guillaume Cinkus(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Zhao Chen(Groundwater Center), Naomi Mazzilli(Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse), Bartolomé Andreo(Universidad de Málaga), Juan Antonio Barberá(Universidad de Málaga), Andreas Wünsch(Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Hervé Jourde(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Tanja Liesch(Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Jaime Fernández-Ortega(Universidad de Málaga), Nataša Ravbar(Karst Research Institute), Nico Goldscheider(Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
Cited by 1
Related Papers
Groundwater level forecasting with artificial neural networks: a comparison of long short-term memory (LSTM), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and non-linear autoregressive networks with exogenous input (NARX)
|Hydrology and earth system sciences|2021|312
Groundwater vulnerability to pollution in karst aquifers, considering key challenges and considerations: application to the Ubrique springs in southern Spain
|Hydrogeology Journal|2021|34
Comparison of artificial neural networks and reservoir models for simulating karst spring discharge on five test sites in the Alpine and Mediterranean regions
|Hydrology and earth system sciences|2023|29
Distribution, threats and protection of selected karst groundwater-dependent ecosystems in the Mediterranean region
|Hydrogeology Journal|2023|26