Six-year absolute invasive disease-free survival benefit of adding adjuvant pertuzumab to trastuzumab and chemotherapy for patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer: A Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) analysis of the APHINITY (BIG 4-11) trial

Richard D. Gelber(Harvard University), Xin V. Wang(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Bernard F. Cole(University of Vermont), David Cameron(Edinburgh Cancer Research), Fátima Cardoso(Champalimaud Foundation), Vivianne C. G. Tjan‐Heijnen(Maastricht University Medical Centre), Ian E. Krop(Harvard University), Sherene Loi(The University of Melbourne), Roberto Salgado(Roche (Switzerland)), Astrid Kiermaier(Roche (Switzerland)), Elizabeth S. Frank(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Debora Fumagalli(Breast International Group), Carmela Caballero(Breast International Group), Evandro de Azambuja(Université Libre de Bruxelles), Marion Procter(Frontier Agriculture (United Kingdom)), Emma Clark(Roche (United Kingdom)), Eleonora Restuccia(Roche (Switzerland)), Sarah Heeson(Roche (United Kingdom)), José Bines(Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA), Sibylle Loibl(Cardiovascular Center Bethanien), Martine Piccart(Université Libre de Bruxelles)
European Journal of Cancer
March 18, 2022
Cited by 17Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

AIM: The APHINITY trial showed that adding adjuvant pertuzumab (P) to trastuzumab and chemotherapy, compared with adding placebo (Pla), significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) for patients with HER2+ early breast cancer both overall and for the node-positive (N+) cohort. We explored whether adding P could benefit some N- subpopulations and whether to consider de-escalation for some N+ subpopulations. METHODS: Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) is an exploratory, graphical method that plots estimates of treatment effect for overlapping patient subpopulations defined by a covariate of interest. We used STEPP to estimate Kaplan-Meier differences in 6-year IDFS percentages (P minus Pla: Δ ± standard error [SE]), both overall and by nodal status, for overlapping subpopulations defined by (1) a clinical composite risk score, (2) tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) percentage, and (3) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) FISH copy number. Because of multiplicity, a Δ of at least three SE is required to warrant attention. RESULTS: The average absolute gains in 6-year IDFS percentages were 2.8 ± 0.9 overall; 4.5 ± 1.2 for N+ and 0.1 ± 1.1 for N-. Largest gains were for patients with intermediate clinical composite risk (5.3 ± 1.9 overall; 6.9 ± 2.3 N+; 4.0 ± 3.0 N-), highest TILs percentage (6.3 ± 1.7 overall; 7.4 ± 2.4 N+; 3.2 ± 1.7 N-), and intermediate HER2 copy number (2.8 ± 1.9 overall; 7.4 ± 2.5 N+; -1.3 ± 1.9 N-), but clear evidence indicating a pattern of differential subpopulation treatment effects was lacking. CONCLUSIONS: STEPP plots for N- did not identify subpopulations clearly benefiting from adding P, and those for N+ did not identify subpopulations warranting de-escalation. TILs percentage appeared to be more predictive of P treatment effect than clinical composite risk score. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01358877.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis