Breast Cancer Screening Strategies for Women With <i>ATM, CHEK2</i>, and <i>PALB2</i> Pathogenic Variants

Kathryn P. Lowry(Seattle Cancer Care Alliance), H. Amarens Geuzinge(Erasmus MC), Natasha K. Stout(Harvard University), Oğuzhan Alagöz(University of Wisconsin–Madison), John M. Hampton(University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center), Karla Kerlikowske(University of California, San Francisco), Harry J. de Koning(Erasmus MC), Diana L. Miglioretti(University of California, Davis), Nicolien T. van Ravesteyn(Erasmus MC), Clyde B. Schechter(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Brian L. Sprague(University of Vermont), Anna N.A. Tosteson(Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice), Amy Trentham‐Dietz(University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center), Donald L. Weaver(University of Vermont), Martin J. Yaffe(University of Toronto), Jennifer M. Yeh(Boston Children's Hospital), Fergus J. Couch(Mayo Clinic), Chunling Hu(Mayo Clinic), Peter Kraft(Harvard University), Eric C. Polley(Mayo Clinic in Florida), Jeanne S. Mandelblatt(Georgetown University), Allison W. Kurian(Stanford University), Mark E. Robson(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Steven N. Hart(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Katherine L. Nathanson(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Susan M. Domchek(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Christine B. Ambrosone(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Hoda Anton‐Culver(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Paul L. Auer(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Elisa V. Bandera(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Leslie Berstein(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Kimberly A. Bertrand(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Elizabeth S. Burnside(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Brian D. Carter(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), A. Heather Eliassen(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Mia M. Gaudet(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Christopher Haiman(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), James M. Hodge(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), David J. Hunter(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Eric J. Jacobs(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Esther M. John(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Charles Kooperberg(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), James V. Lacey(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Loı̈c Le Marchand(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Sara Lindström(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Huiyan Ma(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Elena Martínez(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Susan L. Neuhausen(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Polly A. Newcomb(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Katie M. O’Brien(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Janet E. Olson(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Irene M. Ong(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Tuya Pal(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Julie R. Palmer(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Alpa V. Patel(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Sonya Reid(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Lynn Rosenberg(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Dale P. Sandler(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Rulla M. Tamimi(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Jack A. Taylor(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Lauren R. Teras(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Celine M. Vachon(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Clarice R. Weinberg(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Siddhartha Yadav(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Song Yao(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Argyrios Ziogas(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), Jeffrey N. Weitzel(Breast Cancer Research Foundation), David E. Goldgar(Breast Cancer Research Foundation)
JAMA Oncology
February 17, 2022
Cited by 87Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Screening mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are recommended for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. However, there are few data to guide screening regimens for these women. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening strategies using mammography and MRI at various start ages for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative modeling analysis used 2 established breast cancer microsimulation models from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) to evaluate different screening strategies. Age-specific breast cancer risks were estimated using aggregated data from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium for 32 247 cases and 32 544 controls in 12 population-based studies. Data on screening performance for mammography and MRI were estimated from published literature. The models simulated US women with ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 pathogenic variants born in 1985. INTERVENTIONS: Screening strategies with combinations of annual mammography alone and with MRI starting at age 25, 30, 35, or 40 years until age 74 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Estimated lifetime breast cancer mortality reduction, life-years gained, breast cancer deaths averted, total screening examinations, false-positive screenings, and benign biopsies per 1000 women screened. Results are reported as model mean values and ranges. RESULTS: The mean model-estimated lifetime breast cancer risk was 20.9% (18.1%-23.7%) for women with ATM pathogenic variants, 27.6% (23.4%-31.7%) for women with CHEK2 pathogenic variants, and 39.5% (35.6%-43.3%) for women with PALB2 pathogenic variants. Across pathogenic variants, annual mammography alone from 40 to 74 years was estimated to reduce breast cancer mortality by 36.4% (34.6%-38.2%) to 38.5% (37.8%-39.2%) compared with no screening. Screening with annual MRI starting at 35 years followed by annual mammography and MRI at 40 years was estimated to reduce breast cancer mortality by 54.4% (54.2%-54.7%) to 57.6% (57.2%-58.0%), with 4661 (4635-4688) to 5001 (4979-5023) false-positive screenings and 1280 (1272-1287) to 1368 (1362-1374) benign biopsies per 1000 women. Annual MRI starting at 30 years followed by mammography and MRI at 40 years was estimated to reduce mortality by 55.4% (55.3%-55.4%) to 59.5% (58.5%-60.4%), with 5075 (5057-5093) to 5415 (5393-5437) false-positive screenings and 1439 (1429-1449) to 1528 (1517-1538) benign biopsies per 1000 women. When starting MRI at 30 years, initiating annual mammography starting at 30 vs 40 years did not meaningfully reduce mean mortality rates (0.1% [0.1%-0.2%] to 0.3% [0.2%-0.3%]) but was estimated to add 649 (602-695) to 650 (603-696) false-positive screenings and 58 (41-76) to 59 (41-76) benign biopsies per 1000 women. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This analysis suggests that annual MRI screening starting at 30 to 35 years followed by annual MRI and mammography at 40 years may reduce breast cancer mortality by more than 50% for women with ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 pathogenic variants. In the setting of MRI screening, mammography prior to 40 years may offer little additional benefit.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis