Second International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions)

Christoph Rageth(University of Geneva), Elizabeth O’Flynn(St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Katja Pinker(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), R. Huch(Kantonsspital Baden), Alexander Mundinger(Nike (United States)), Thomas Decker(Dietrich Bonhoeffer Klinikum), Christoph Tausch(Immunologie-Zentrum Zürich), Florian Dammann(University Hospital of Bern), Pascal Baltzer(Medical University of Vienna), Eva Maria Fallenberg(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Maria Pia Foschini(University of Bologna), Sophie Dellas(University of Basel), Michael Knauer(Kantonsspital St. Gallen), Caroline Malhaire(Université Paris Sciences et Lettres), Martin Sonnenschein(Engeriedspital), Andreas Boos(University Hospital of Zurich), Elizabeth A. Morris(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Zsuzsanna Varga(University Hospital of Zurich)
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
November 30, 2018
Cited by 251Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The second International Consensus Conference on B3 lesions was held in Zurich, Switzerland, in March 2018, organized by the International Breast Ultrasound School to re-evaluate the consensus recommendations. This study (1) evaluated how management recommendations of the first Zurich Consensus Conference of 2016 on B3 lesions had influenced daily practice and (2) reviewed current literature towards recommendations to biopsy. In 2018, the consensus recommendations for management of B3 lesions remained almost unchanged: For flat epithelial atypia (FEA), classical lobular neoplasia (LN), papillary lesions (PL) and radial scars (RS) diagnosed on core-needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB), excision by VAB in preference to open surgery, and for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and phyllodes tumors (PT) diagnosed at VAB or CNB, first-line open surgical excision (OE) with follow-up surveillance imaging for 5 years. Analyzing the Database of the Swiss Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsies (MIBB) with more than 30,000 procedures recorded, there was a significant increase in recommending more frequent surveillance of LN [65% in 2018 vs. 51% in 2016 (p = 0.004)], FEA (72% in 2018 vs. 62% in 2016 (p = 0.005)), and PL [(76% in 2018 vs. 70% in 2016 (p = 0.04)] diagnosed on VAB. A trend to more frequent surveillance was also noted also for RS [77% in 2018 vs. 67% in 2016 (p = 0.07)]. Minimally invasive management of B3 lesions (except ADH and PT) with VAB continues to be appropriate as an alternative to first-line OE in most cases, but with more frequent surveillance, especially for LN.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis