EPHA2 mediates PDGFA activity and functions together with PDGFRA as prognostic marker and therapeutic target in glioblastoma

Qu‐Jing Gai(Army Medical University), Zhen Fu(Army Medical University), Jiang He(Army Medical University), Min Mao(Army Medical University), Xiao‐Xue Yao(Army Medical University), Yan Qin(Army Medical University), Chunyan Lan(Army Medical University), Lin Zhang(Army Medical University), Jingya Miao(Army Medical University), Yanxia Wang(Army Medical University), Jiang Zhu(Army Medical University), Fei‐Cheng Yang(Army Medical University), Huimin Lu(Army Medical University), Zexuan Yan(Army Medical University), Fanglin Chen(Army Medical University), Yu Shi(Army Medical University), Yi‐Fang Ping(Army Medical University), You‐Hong Cui(Army Medical University), Xia Zhang(Army Medical University), Xindong Liu(Army Medical University), Xiaohong Yao(Army Medical University), Shengqing Lv(Army Medical University), Xiu‐Wu Bian(Army Medical University), Yan Wang(Army Medical University)
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
February 2, 2022
Cited by 70Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Platelet-derived growth subunit A (PDGFA) plays critical roles in development of glioblastoma (GBM) with substantial evidence from TCGA database analyses and in vivo mouse models. So far, only platelet-derived growth receptor α (PDGFRA) has been identified as receptor for PDGFA. However, PDGFA and PDGFRA are categorized into different molecular subtypes of GBM in TCGA_GBM database. Our data herein further showed that activity or expression deficiency of PDGFRA did not effectively block PDGFA activity. Therefore, PDGFRA might be not necessary for PDGFA function.To profile proteins involved in PDGFA function, we performed co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and Mass Spectrum (MS) and delineated the network of PDGFA-associated proteins for the first time. Unexpectedly, the data showed that EPHA2 could be temporally activated by PDGFA even without activation of PDGFRA and AKT. Furthermore, MS, Co-IP, in vitro binding thermodynamics, and proximity ligation assay consistently proved the interaction of EPHA2 and PDGFA. In addition, we observed that high expression of EPHA2 leaded to upregulation of PDGF signaling targets in TCGA_GBM database and clinical GBM samples. Co-upregulation of PDGFRA and EPHA2 leaded to worse patient prognosis and poorer therapeutic effects than other contexts, which might arise from expression elevation of genes related with malignant molecular subtypes and invasive growth. Due to PDGFA-induced EPHA2 activation, blocking PDGFRA by inhibitor could not effectively suppress proliferation of GBM cells, but simultaneous inhibition of both EPHA2 and PDGFRA showed synergetic inhibitory effects on GBM cells in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, our study provided new insights on PDGFA function and revealed EPHA2 as a potential receptor of PDGFA. EPHA2 might contribute to PDGFA signaling transduction in combination with PDGFRA and mediate the resistance of GBM cells to PDGFRA inhibitor. Therefore, combination of inhibitors targeting PDGFRA and EHA2 represented a promising therapeutic strategy for GBM treatment.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis