Mapping intracellular pH in tumors using amide and guanidyl CEST‐MRI at 9.4 T
Philip S. Boyd(Heidelberg University), Steffen Goerke(German Cancer Research Center), Karin Mueller‐Decker(German Cancer Research Center), Moritz Zaiß(Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), Peter Bachert(German Cancer Research Center), Andreas Korzowski(German Cancer Research Center), Johannes Breitling(German Cancer Research Center), Mark E. Ladd(German Cancer Research Center), Andrey Glinka(German Cancer Research Center), Vanessa L. Franke(German Cancer Research Center)
Cited by 30
Related Papers
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
|Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy|2018|542
Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra
|Journal of Magnetic Resonance|2011|326
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR<i>Z</i>-spectroscopy<i>in vivo</i>: a review of theoretical approaches and methods
|Physics in Medicine and Biology|2013|320
Inverse <i>Z</i>‐spectrum analysis for spillover‐, MT‐, and <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>‐corrected steady‐state pulsed CEST‐MRI – application to pH‐weighted MRI of acute stroke
|NMR in Biomedicine|2014|311
Review and consensus recommendations on clinical <scp>APT</scp>‐weighted imaging approaches at <scp>3T</scp>: Application to brain tumors
|Magnetic Resonance in Medicine|2022|236