Concomitant Tricuspid Repair in Patients with Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

James S. Gammie(Western University), Michael Chu(Western University), Volkmar Falk(Western University), Jessica Overbey(Western University), Alan J. Moskowitz(Western University), Marc Gillinov(Western University), Michael J. Mack(Western University), Pierre Voisine(Western University), Markus Krane(Western University), Babatunde A. Yerokun(Western University), Michael E. Bowdish(University of Southern California), Lenard Conradi(Western University), Steven F. Bolling(Western University), Marissa A. Miller(Western University), Wendy C. Taddei‐Peters(Western University), Neal Jeffries(Western University), Michael K. Parides(Western University), Richard D. Weisel(Western University), Mariell Jessup(Western University), Eric A. Rose(Western University), John C. Mullen(Western University), Samantha Raymond(Western University), Ellen Moquete(Western University), Karen O’Sullivan(Western University), Mary E. Marks(Western University), Alexander Iribarne(Western University), Friedhelm Beyersdorf(Western University), Michael A. Borger(Western University), Arnar Geirsson(Western University), Emilia Bagiella(Western University), Judy Hung(Western University), Annetine C. Gelijns(Western University), Patrick T. O’Gara(Western University), Gorav Ailawadi(Western University)
New England Journal of Medicine
November 13, 2021
Cited by 253Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid regurgitation is common in patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation. However, the evidence base is insufficient to inform a decision about whether to perform tricuspid-valve repair during mitral-valve surgery in patients who have moderate tricuspid regurgitation or less-than-moderate regurgitation with annular dilatation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 401 patients who were undergoing mitral-valve surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation to receive a procedure with or without tricuspid annuloplasty (TA). The primary 2-year end point was a composite of reoperation for tricuspid regurgitation, progression of tricuspid regurgitation by two grades from baseline or the presence of severe tricuspid regurgitation, or death. RESULTS: Patients who underwent mitral-valve surgery plus TA had fewer primary-end-point events than those who underwent mitral-valve surgery alone (3.9% vs. 10.2%) (relative risk, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.86; P = 0.02). Two-year mortality was 3.2% in the surgery-plus-TA group and 4.5% in the surgery-alone group (relative risk, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.25 to 1.88). The 2-year prevalence of progression of tricuspid regurgitation was lower in the surgery-plus-TA group than in the surgery-alone group (0.6% vs. 6.1%; relative risk, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.69). The frequencies of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, functional status, and quality of life were similar in the two groups at 2 years, although the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation was higher in the surgery-plus-TA group than in the surgery-alone group (14.1% vs. 2.5%; rate ratio, 5.75; 95% CI, 2.27 to 14.60). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing mitral-valve surgery, those who also received TA had a lower incidence of a primary-end-point event than those who underwent mitral-valve surgery alone at 2 years, a reduction that was driven by less frequent progression to severe tricuspid regurgitation. Tricuspid repair resulted in more frequent permanent pacemaker implantation. Whether reduced progression of tricuspid regurgitation results in long-term clinical benefit can be determined only with longer follow-up. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the German Center for Cardiovascular Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02675244.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis