Microscopic multifrequency MR elastography for mapping viscoelasticity in zebrafish

Jakob Jordan(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Gergely Bertalan(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Tom Meyer(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Heiko Tzschätzsch(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Anton Gauert(German Cancer Research Center), Luca Bramé(German Cancer Research Center), Helge Herthum(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Yasmine Safraou(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Leif Schröder(Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie), Jürgen Braun(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Anja I.H. Hagemann(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Ingolf Sack(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin)
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
November 9, 2021
Cited by 13Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: The zebrafish (Danio rerio) has become an important animal model in a wide range of biomedical research disciplines. Growing awareness of the role of biomechanical properties in tumor progression and neuronal development has led to an increasing interest in the noninvasive mapping of the viscoelastic properties of zebrafish by elastography methods applicable to bulky and nontranslucent tissues. METHODS: Microscopic multifrequency MR elastography is introduced for mapping shear wave speed (SWS) and loss angle (φ) as markers of stiffness and viscosity of muscle, brain, and neuroblastoma tumors in postmortem zebrafish with 60 µm in-plane resolution. Experiments were performed in a 7 Tesla MR scanner at 1, 1.2, and 1.4 kHz driving frequencies. RESULTS: Detailed zebrafish viscoelasticity maps revealed that the midbrain region (SWS = 3.1 ± 0.7 m/s, φ = 1.2 ± 0.3 radian [rad]) was stiffer and less viscous than telencephalon (SWS = 2.6 ± 0. 5 m/s, φ = 1.4 ± 0.2 rad) and optic tectum (SWS = 2.6 ± 0.5 m/s, φ = 1.3 ± 0.4 rad), whereas the cerebellum (SWS = 2.9 ± 0.6 m/s, φ = 0.9 ± 0.4 rad) was stiffer but less viscous than both (all p < .05). Overall, brain tissue (SWS = 2.9 ± 0.4 m/s, φ = 1.2 ± 0.2 rad) had similar stiffness but lower viscosity values than muscle tissue (SWS = 2.9 ± 0.5 m/s, φ = 1.4 ± 0.2 rad), whereas neuroblastoma (SWS = 2.4 ± 0.3 m/s, φ = 0.7 ± 0.1 rad, all p < .05) was the softest and least viscous tissue. CONCLUSION: Microscopic multifrequency MR elastography-generated maps of zebrafish show many details of viscoelasticity and resolve tissue regions, of great interest in neuromechanical and oncological research and for which our study provides first reference values.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis