Efficacy of Kinesio Taping Compared to Other Treatment Modalities in Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Linh Tran(Duy Tan University), Abdelrahman M Makram(October 6 University), Omar Mohamed Makram(London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Muhammed Khaled Elfaituri(University of Tripoli), Sara Morsy(Tanta University), Sherief Ghozy(Mansoura University), Ahmad Helmy Zayan(Nagasaki University), Nguyen Hai Nam(Kyoto University), Marwa Mostafa Mohamed Zaki(Nagasaki University), Elizabeth L Allison(American University), Truong Hong Hieu(University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City), Loc Le Quang(University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City), Dang The Hung(University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City), Nguyen Tien Huy(Nagasaki University)
Research in Sports Medicine
October 28, 2021
Cited by 51Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Kinesio taping is widely used in musculoskeletal conditions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders compared to other interventions. Twelve electronic databases were used for systemic search and data relevant to pain and disability were extracted. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018087606). Meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of kinesio taping to other modalities of musculoskeletal disorders. As a result, 36 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Kinesio taping was found to provide an improvement of both pain and disability when applied to any region of the body. In the first five days of application, kinesio taping significantly reduced the pain in all body regions (SMD = −0.63, 95%CI: −0.87, −0.39). This was also noted after four-to-six weeks of application (SMD = −0.76, 95%CI: −1.07, −0.45). When kinesio taping was used for disability in low back pain patients, it significantly reduced the disability within five days of application (SMD = −0.70, 95%CI: −1.29, −0.11). Finally, kinesio taping has shown an improvement of the disability in all body regions after four-to-six weeks of application (SMD = −0.59, 95%CI: −0.96, −0.22). Our findings support kinesio taping as an adjuvant to other treatments for musculoskeletal disorders. Abbreviations KT = Kinesio taping; MSK = musculoskeletal; SD = standard deviation; CR = conventional rehabilitation; NDI = Neck Disability Index; NPS = Numerical Pain Scale; CTM = Cervical Thrust Manipulation; PIR = Post-isometric muscle relaxation; NPRS Numerical Pain Rating Scale; OA = osteoarthritis; ROM = Range of motion; VAS = visual analogue scale; VAS-W = visual analogue scale-worst pain; VAS-U = visual analogue scale-usual pain; VAS-R = visual analogue scale-resting pain; VAS-A = visual analogue scale-activity pain; VAS-N = visual analogue scale-night pain; NPDS = Neck Pain Disability Scale; QA = Quality assessment


Related Papers