Correlates of protection against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection

S Feng(University of Oxford), Daniel J. Phillips(University of Oxford), Thomas White(AstraZeneca (Switzerland)), Homesh Sayal(AstraZeneca (Switzerland)), Parvinder K. Aley(University of Oxford), Sagida Bibi(University of Oxford), Christina Dold(University of Oxford), Michelle Fuskova(Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom)), Sarah C. Gilbert(University of Oxford), Ian Hirsch(AstraZeneca (Switzerland)), Holly E. Humphries(Public Health England), Brett Jepson(AstraZeneca (Switzerland)), Elizabeth J. Kelly(AstraZeneca (Switzerland)), Emma Plested(University of Oxford), Kathryn Shoemaker(AstraZeneca (Switzerland)), Kelly Thomas(Public Health England), Johan Vekemans(AstraZeneca (Switzerland)), Tonya Villafana(AstraZeneca (Switzerland)), Teresa Lambe(University of Oxford), Andrew J. Pollard(University of Oxford), Merryn Voysey(University of Oxford), the Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Group
medRxiv
June 24, 2021
Cited by 166Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Background Although 6 COVID-19 vaccines have been approved by the World Health Organisation as of 16 th June 2021, global supply remains limited. An understanding of the immune response associated with protection could facilitate rapid licensure of new vaccines. Methods Data from a randomised efficacy trial of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in the UK was analysed to determine the antibody levels associated with protection against SARS-CoV-2. Anti-spike and anti-RBD IgG by multiplex immunoassay, pseudovirus and live neutralising antibody at 28 days after the second dose were measured in infected and non-infected vaccine recipients. Weighted generalised additive models for binary data were applied to symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection data from ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 recipients. Cubic spline smoothed log antibody levels, and weights were applied to account for potential selection bias in sample processing. Models were adjusted for baseline risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results Higher levels of all immune markers were correlated with a reduced risk of symptomatic infection. Vaccine efficacy of 80% against primary symptomatic COVID-19 was achieved with an antibody level of 40923 (95% CI: 16748, 125017) and 63383 (95% CI: 16903, not computed (NC)) for anti-spike and anti-RBD, and 185 (95% CI: NC, NC) and 247 (95% CI: 101, NC) for pseudo- and live-neutralisation assays respectively. Antibody responses did not correlate with overall protection against asymptomatic infection. Conclusions Correlates of protection can be used to bridge to new populations using validated assays. The data can be used to extrapolate efficacy estimates for new vaccines where large efficacy trials cannot be conducted. More work is needed to assess correlates for emerging variants.


Related Papers