Early relapse identifies MCL patients with inferior survival after intensive or less intensive frontline therapy

David A. Bond(The Ohio State University), Jeffrey M. Switchenko(Emory University), Diego Villa(University of British Columbia), Kami J. Maddocks(The Ohio State University), Michael C. Churnetski(Emory University), Alina S. Gerrie(University of British Columbia), Subir Goyal(Emory University), Krithika Shanmugasundaram(Emory University), Oscar Calzada(Emory University), Bhaskar Kolla(University of Minnesota), Veronika Bachanová(University of Minnesota), James N. Gerson(Fox Chase Cancer Center), Stefan K. Barta(Fox Chase Cancer Center), Brian T. Hill(Cleveland Clinic), Yazeed Sawalha(Cleveland Clinic), Peter Martin(NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital), Edward Maldonado(Oregon Health & Science University), Max J. Gordon(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Alexey V. Danilov(Oregon Health & Science University), Natalie S. Grover(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Stephanie Mathews(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Madelyn Burkart(Northwestern University), Reem Karmali(Northwestern University), Nilanjan Ghosh(Levine Cancer Institute), Steven Park(Levine Cancer Institute), Narendranath Epperla(The Ohio State University), Talha Badar(Medical College of Wisconsin), Jin Guo(NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital), Mehdi Hamadani(Medical College of Wisconsin), Timothy S. Fenske(Medical College of Wisconsin), Mary‐Kate Malecek(Washington University in St. Louis), Brad S. Kahl(Washington University in St. Louis), Christopher R. Flowers(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Kristie A. Blum(Emory University), Jonathon B. Cohen(Emory University)
Blood Advances
September 13, 2021
Cited by 41Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Although an expanding array of effective treatments has resulted in recent improvement in survival of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), outcomes remain heterogeneous, and identification of prognostic factors remains a priority. We assessed the prognostic impact of time to progression of disease (POD) after first-line therapy among 455 patients with relapsed MCL. Patients were categorized by duration of first remission as PRF/POD6, defined as progressive disease during induction or POD within 6 months of diagnosis (n = 65; 14%); POD6-24, defined as POD between 6 and 24 months after diagnosis (n = 153; 34%); and POD>24, defined as POD >24 months after diagnosis (n = 237; 53%). The median overall survival from POD (OS2) was 1.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-2.4) for patients with PRF/POD6, 3 years (95% CI, 2-6.8) for those with POD6-24, and 8 years (95% CI, 6.2-NR) for those with POD>24. Median OS2 was inferior in patients with early POD (defined as PRF/POD6 or POD6-24) after both intensive and less intensive frontline treatment. The prognostic performance of time until POD was replicated in an independent cohort of 245 patients with relapsed MCL, with median OS2 of 0.3 years (95% CI, 0.1-0.5) for PRF/POD6, 0.8 years (95% CI, 0.6-0.9) for POD6-24, and 2.4 years (95% CI 2.1-2.7) for POD>24. Early POD is associated with inferior OS2 in patients with relapsed MCL, identifying a high-risk population for future prospective studies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis