Integrated Biomarkers for the Management of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules

Michael N. Kammer(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Dhairya A. Lakhani(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Aneri Balar(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Sanja Antic(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Amanda Kussrow(Vanderbilt University), Rebekah L. Webster, Shayan Mahapatra(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Udaykamal Barad, Chirayu Shah, Thomas Atwater(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Brenda Diergaarde(UPMC Hillman Cancer Center), Jun Qian(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Alexander Kaizer(Colorado School of Public Health), Melissa L. New(Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates), Erin A. Hirsch(Colorado School of Public Health), William J. Feser(Colorado School of Public Health), Jolene Strong, Matthew J. Rioth(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus), York E. Miller(Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates), Yoganand Balagurunathan(Moffitt Cancer Center), Dianna J. Rowe(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Sherif Helmey(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Sheau‐Chiann Chen(Vanderbilt University Medical Center), Joseph Bauza(American College of Radiology), Stephen A. Deppen(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Kim L. Sandler(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Fabien Maldonado(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Avrum Spira(Boston University), Ehab Billatos(Boston University), Matthew B. Schabath(Moffitt Cancer Center), Robert J. Gillies(Moffitt Cancer Center), David O. Wilson(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Ronald C. Walker, Bennett A. Landman(Vanderbilt University), Heidi Chen(American College of Radiology), Eric L. Grogan(Pulmonary and Allergy Associates), Anna E. Barón(Colorado School of Public Health), Darryl J. Bornhop(Vanderbilt University), Pierre P. Massion(Vanderbilt University)
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
August 31, 2021
Cited by 96Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) at risk of cancer undergo high rates of invasive, costly, and morbid procedures. Objectives To train and externally validate a risk prediction model that combined clinical, blood, and imaging biomarkers to improve the noninvasive management of IPNs. Methods In this prospectively collected, retrospective blinded evaluation study, probability of cancer was calculated for 456 patient nodules using the Mayo Clinic model, and patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. A combined biomarker model (CBM) including clinical variables, serum high sensitivity CYFRA 21-1 level, and a radiomic signature was trained in cohort 1 (n = 170) and validated in cohorts 2–4 (total n = 286). All patients were pooled to recalibrate the model for clinical implementation. The clinical utility of the CBM compared with current clinical care was evaluated in 2 cohorts. Measurements and Main Results The CBM provided improved diagnostic accuracy over the Mayo Clinic model with an improvement in area under the curve of 0.124 (95% bootstrap confidence interval, 0.091–0.156; P < 2 × 10−16). Applying 10% and 70% risk thresholds resulted in a bias-corrected clinical reclassification index for cases and control subjects of 0.15 and 0.12, respectively. A clinical utility analysis of patient medical records estimated that a CBM-guided strategy would have reduced invasive procedures from 62.9% to 50.6% in the intermediate-risk benign population and shortened the median time to diagnosis of cancer from 60 to 21 days in intermediate-risk cancers. Conclusions Integration of clinical, blood, and image biomarkers improves noninvasive diagnosis of patients with IPNs, potentially reducing the rate of unnecessary invasive procedures while shortening the time to diagnosis.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis