Low molecular weight heparin is useful in adult COVID-19 inpatients. Experience during the first Spanish wave: observational study

José Ramón González‐Porras(Universidad de Salamanca), Moncef Belhassen‐García(Universidad de Salamanca), Amparo López‐Bernús(Universidad de Salamanca), Luis Mario Vaquero‐Roncero(Universidad de Salamanca), Beatriz Rodríguez-Alonso(Universidad de Salamanca), Cristina Carbonell(Universidad de Salamanca), Raúl Azibeiro(Universidad de Salamanca), Alberto Hernández‐Sánchez(Universidad de Salamanca), José Ignacio Martín‐González(Universidad de Salamanca), Juan Miguel Manrique(Universidad de Salamanca), Gloria Alonso-Claudio(Universidad de Salamanca), Felipe Alvárez-Navia(Universidad de Salamanca), José Ignacio Madruga-Martín(Universidad de Salamanca), Ronald Paul Macias-Casanova(Universidad de Salamanca), Jorge García-Criado(Universidad de Salamanca), Francisco S. Lozano(Universidad de Salamanca), Jose Carlos Moyano(Universidad de Salamanca), Miguel Vicente Sánchez-Hernandez(Universidad de Salamanca), Víctor Sagredo(Universidad de Salamanca), Rafael Borrás(Universidad de Salamanca), José María Bastida(Universidad de Salamanca), Guillermo Hernández‐Pérez(Universidad de Salamanca), Antonio Javier Chamorro Fernández(Universidad de Salamanca), Miguel Marcos(Universidad de Salamanca), José-Ángel Martín-Oterino(Universidad de Salamanca)
Sao Paulo Medical Journal
August 13, 2021
Cited by 28Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intensity of the thromboprophylaxis needed as a potential factor for preventing inpatient mortality due to coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between anticoagulation intensity and COVID-19 survival. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary-level hospital in Spain. METHODS: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) status was ascertained based on prescription at admission. To control for immortal time bias, anticoagulant use was analyzed as a time-dependent variable. RESULTS: 690 patients were included (median age, 72 years). LMWH was administered to 615 patients, starting from hospital admission (89.1%). 410 (66.7%) received prophylactic-dose LMWH; 120 (19.5%), therapeutic-dose LMWH; and another 85 (13.8%) who presented respiratory failure, high D-dimer levels (> 3 mg/l) and non-worsening of inflammation markers received prophylaxis of intermediate-dose LMWH. The overall inpatient-mortality rate was 38.5%. The anticoagulant nonuser group presented higher mortality risk than each of the following groups: any LMWH users (HR 2.1; 95% CI: 1.40-3.15); the prophylactic-dose heparin group (HR 2.39; 95% CI, 1.57-3.64); and the users of heparin dose according to biomarkers (HR 6.52; 95% CI, 2.95-14.41). 3.4% of the patients experienced major hemorrhage. 2.8% of the patients developed an episode of thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study showed that LMWH administered at the time of admission was associated with lower mortality among unselected adult COVID-19 inpatients. The magnitude of the benefit may have been greatest for the intermediate-dose subgroup. Randomized controlled trials to assess the benefit of heparin within different therapeutic regimes for COVID-19 patients are required.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis