Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase–Producing <i>Enterobacter</i> spp, <i>Citrobacter freundii</i>, <i>Morganella morganii</i>, <i>Providencia</i> spp, or <i>Serratia marcescens</i>: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MERINO-2)

Adam G. Stewart(The University of Queensland), David L. Paterson(The University of Queensland), Barnaby Edward Young(Nanyang Technological University), David Chien Lye(National University of Singapore), Joshua S. Davis(John Hunter Hospital), Kellie E. Schneider(John Hunter Hospital), Mesut Yılmaz(Istanbul Medipol University), Rumeysa Dinleyici(Istanbul Medipol University), Naomi Runnegar(Princess Alexandra Hospital), Andrew Henderson(The University of Queensland), Sophia Archuleta(National University of Singapore), Shirin Kalimuddin(National University of Singapore), Brian M. Forde(The University of Queensland), Mark D. Chatfield(The University of Queensland), Michelle J. Bauer(The University of Queensland), Jeffrey Lipman(The University of Queensland), Tiffany Harris‐Brown(The University of Queensland), Patrick N. A. Harris(The University of Queensland), Po Ying Chia, Gail Brenda Cross, Jyoti Somani, Gabriel Yan
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
August 1, 2021
Cited by 91Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Background Carbapenems are recommended treatment for serious infections caused by AmpC-producing gram-negative bacteria but can select for carbapenem resistance. Piperacillin-tazobactam may be a suitable alternative. Methods We enrolled adult patients with bloodstream infection due to chromosomal AmpC producers in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients were assigned 1:1 to receive piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g every 6 hours or meropenem 1 g every 8 hours. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, clinical failure, microbiological failure, and microbiological relapse at 30 days. Results Seventy-two patients underwent randomization and were included in the primary analysis population. Eleven of 38 patients (29%) randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam met the primary outcome compared with 7 of 34 patients (21%) in the meropenem group (risk difference, 8% [95% confidence interval {CI}, –12% to 28%]). Effects were consistent in an analysis of the per-protocol population. Within the subcomponents of the primary outcome, 5 of 38 (13%) experienced microbiological failure in the piperacillin-tazobactam group compared to 0 of 34 patients (0%) in the meropenem group (risk difference, 13% [95% CI, 2% to 24%]). In contrast, 0% vs 9% of microbiological relapses were seen in the piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem arms, respectively. Susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem using broth microdilution was found in 96.5% and 100% of isolates, respectively. The most common AmpC β-lactamase genes identified were blaCMY-2, blaDHA-17, blaCMH-3, and blaACT-17. No ESBL, OXA, or other carbapenemase genes were identified. Conclusions Among patients with bloodstream infection due to AmpC producers, piperacillin-tazobactam may lead to more microbiological failures, although fewer microbiological relapses were seen. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02437045.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis