The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation

Marty Kardos(NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service), Ellie E. Armstrong(Stanford University), Sarah W. Fitzpatrick(Michigan State University), Samantha Hauser(University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee), Philip W. Hedrick(Arizona State University), Joshua M. Miller(Zoological Society of San Diego), David A. Tallmon(University of Alaska Southeast), W. Chris Funk(Colorado State University)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
November 12, 2021
Cited by 568Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The unprecedented rate of extinction calls for efficient use of genetics to help conserve biodiversity. Several recent genomic and simulation-based studies have argued that the field of conservation biology has placed too much focus on conserving genome-wide genetic variation, and that the field should instead focus on managing the subset of functional genetic variation that is thought to affect fitness. Here, we critically evaluate the feasibility and likely benefits of this approach in conservation. We find that population genetics theory and empirical results show that conserving genome-wide genetic variation is generally the best approach to prevent inbreeding depression and loss of adaptive potential from driving populations toward extinction. Focusing conservation efforts on presumably functional genetic variation will only be feasible occasionally, often misleading, and counterproductive when prioritized over genome-wide genetic variation. Given the increasing rate of habitat loss and other environmental changes, failure to recognize the detrimental effects of lost genome-wide genetic variation on long-term population viability will only worsen the biodiversity crisis.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis