Donafenib Versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Controlled Phase II-III Trial

Shukui Qin(Sichuan University), Feng Bi(Sichuan University), Shanzhi Gu(Central South University), Yuxian Bai(Harbin Medical University), Zhendong Chen(Anhui Medical University), Zishu Wang(First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College), Jieer Ying(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Yinying Lu(Chinese PLA General Hospital), Zhiqiang Meng(Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center), Hongming Pan(Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital), Ping Yang(Chinese PLA General Hospital), Helong Zhang(Air Force Medical University), Xi Chen(82th Hospital of Pla), Aibing Xu(Nantong Tumor Hospital), Chengxu Cui(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Bo Zhu(Army Medical University), Jian Wu(Zhejiang University), Xiaoli Xin(The Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang), Jufeng Wang(Zhengzhou University), Jinlu Shan(Army Medical University), Junhui Chen(Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Zhendong Zheng(General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region), Li Xu(Sun Yat-sen University), Xiaoyu Wen(Jilin University), Zhenyu You(General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region), Zhenggang Ren(Fudan University), Xiufeng Liu(Sichuan University), Meng Qiu(Sichuan University), Liqing Wu, Feng Chen(Nanjing Medical University)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
June 29, 2021
Cited by 407Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE Donafenib, a novel multikinase inhibitor and a deuterated sorafenib derivative, has shown efficacy in phase Ia and Ib hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of donafenib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled, multicenter phase II-III trial enrolled patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC, a Child-Pugh score ≤ 7, and no prior systemic therapy from 37 sites across China. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral donafenib (0.2 g) or sorafenib (0.4 g) twice daily until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), tested for noninferiority and superiority. Efficacy was primarily assessed in the full analysis set (FAS), and safety was assessed in all treated patients. RESULTS Between March 21, 2016, and April 16, 2018, 668 patients (intention-to-treat) were randomly assigned to donafenib and sorafenib treatment arms; the FAS included 328 and 331 patients, respectively. Median OS was significantly longer with donafenib than sorafenib treatment (FAS; 12.1 v 10.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.831; 95% CI, 0.699 to 0.988; P = .0245); donafenib also exhibited superior OS outcomes versus sorafenib in the intention-to-treat population. The median progression-free survival was 3.7 v 3.6 months ( P = .0570). The objective response rate was 4.6% v 2.7% ( P = .2448), and the disease control rate was 30.8% v 28.7% (FAS; P = .5532). Drug-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in significantly fewer patients receiving donafenib than sorafenib (125 [38%] v 165 [50%]; P = .0018). CONCLUSION Donafenib showed superiority over sorafenib in improving OS and has favorable safety and tolerability in Chinese patients with advanced HCC, showing promise as a potential first-line monotherapy for these patients.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis