Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis
Areti Angeliki Veroniki(John Brown University), Georgia Salanti(University of Bern), Pınar AMBARCIOĞLU(Mustafa Kemal University), Sofia Tsokani(University of Ioannina), Irene Pagkalidou(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), Brian Hutton(Ottawa Hospital), Katerina‐Maria Kontouli(University of Ioannina), Nikos Pandis(University of Bern), Carole Lunny(University of British Columbia), Andrea C. Tricco(St. Michael's Hospital), Theodoros Papakonstantinou(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), Stella Zevgiti(University of Ioannina), Dimitris Mavridis(Délégation Paris 5), Anna Chaimani(Inserm), Adriani Nikolakopoulou(Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine), Sharon E. Straus(University of Toronto)
Cited by 53
Related Papers
The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
|Annals of Internal Medicine|2015|8.2k
Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial
|Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|2010|3.8k
Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of 21 Antidepressant Drugs for the Acute Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
|The Lancet|2018|3.5k
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis
|The Lancet|2013|2.5k
Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA
|PLoS ONE|2013|2.5k