OBO Foundry in 2021: operationalizing open data principles to evaluate ontologies

Rebecca Jackson, Nicolas Matentzoglu, James A. Overton, Randi Vita(La Jolla Institute for Immunology), James P. Balhoff(Renaissance Computing Institute), Pier Luigi Buttigieg(Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung), Seth Carbon(Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Mélanie Courtot(European Bioinformatics Institute), Alexander D. Diehl(University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Damion Dooley(Simon Fraser University), William D. Duncan(Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Nomi L. Harris(Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Melissa Haendel(University of Colorado Denver), Suzanna Lewis(Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Darren A. Natale(Georgetown University), David Osumi-Sutherland(European Bioinformatics Institute), Alan Ruttenberg(University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Lynn M. Schriml(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Barry Smith(University at Buffalo, State University of New York), Christian J. Stoeckert(University of Pennsylvania), Nicole Vasilevsky(University of Colorado Denver), Ramona Walls(Critical Path Institute), Jie Zheng(University of Pennsylvania), Chris Mungall(Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Bjoern Peters(La Jolla Institute for Immunology)
Database
October 1, 2021
Cited by 205Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Biological ontologies are used to organize, curate and interpret the vast quantities of data arising from biological experiments. While this works well when using a single ontology, integrating multiple ontologies can be problematic, as they are developed independently, which can lead to incompatibilities. The Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry was created to address this by facilitating the development, harmonization, application and sharing of ontologies, guided by a set of overarching principles. One challenge in reaching these goals was that the OBO principles were not originally encoded in a precise fashion, and interpretation was subjective. Here, we show how we have addressed this by formally encoding the OBO principles as operational rules and implementing a suite of automated validation checks and a dashboard for objectively evaluating each ontology's compliance with each principle. This entailed a substantial effort to curate metadata across all ontologies and to coordinate with individual stakeholders. We have applied these checks across the full OBO suite of ontologies, revealing areas where individual ontologies require changes to conform to our principles. Our work demonstrates how a sizable, federated community can be organized and evaluated on objective criteria that help improve overall quality and interoperability, which is vital for the sustenance of the OBO project and towards the overall goals of making data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). Database URL http://obofoundry.org/.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis