Over‐optimism in benchmark studies and the multiplicity of design and analysis options when interpreting their results
Christina Nießl(Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands)), Anne‐Laure Boulesteix(Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands)), Moritz Herrmann(Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands)), Giuseppe Casalicchio(Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Chiara Wiedemann(Zimmer Biomet (Germany))
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
December 13, 2021
Cited by 5
Related Papers
Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution
|BMC Bioinformatics|2007|3.7k
Conditional variable importance for random forests
|BMC Bioinformatics|2008|3.3k
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods
|BMJ|2024|2.8k
Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics
|Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery|2012|937
Random forest versus logistic regression: a large-scale benchmark experiment
|BMC Bioinformatics|2018|882