Biomarkers Associating with PARP Inhibitor Benefit in Prostate Cancer in the TOPARP-B Trial

Suzanne Carreira(Institute of Cancer Research), Núria Porta(Institute of Cancer Research), Sara Arce‐Gallego(Hebron University), George Seed(Institute of Cancer Research), Alba Llop‐Guevara(Hebron University), Diletta Bianchini(Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust), Pasquale Rescigno(Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust), Alec Paschalis(Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust), Cláudia Bertan(Institute of Cancer Research), Chloe Baker(Institute of Cancer Research), Jane Goodall(Institute of Cancer Research), Susana Miranda(Institute of Cancer Research), Ruth Riisnaes(Institute of Cancer Research), Ines Figueiredo(Institute of Cancer Research), Ana Ferreira(Institute of Cancer Research), Rita Pereira(Institute of Cancer Research), Mateus Crespo(Institute of Cancer Research), Bora Gürel(Institute of Cancer Research), Daniel Nava Rodrigues(Institute of Cancer Research), Stephen J. Pettitt(Institute of Cancer Research), Wei Yuan(Institute of Cancer Research), Violeta Serra(Hebron University), Jan Rekowski(Institute of Cancer Research), Christopher J. Lord(Institute of Cancer Research), Emma Hall(Institute of Cancer Research), Joaquı́n Mateo(Hebron University), Johann S. de Bono(Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust)
Cancer Discovery
May 27, 2021
Cited by 160Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract PARP inhibitors are approved for treating advanced prostate cancers (APC) with various defective DNA repair genes; however, further studies to clinically qualify predictive biomarkers are warranted. Herein we analyzed TOPARP-B phase II clinical trial samples, evaluating whole-exome and low-pass whole-genome sequencing and IHC and IF assays evaluating ATM and RAD51 foci (testing homologous recombination repair function). BRCA1/2 germline and somatic pathogenic mutations associated with similar benefit from olaparib; greater benefit was observed with homozygous BRCA2 deletion. Biallelic, but not monoallelic, PALB2 deleterious alterations were associated with clinical benefit. In the ATM cohort, loss of ATM protein by IHC was associated with a better outcome. RAD51 foci loss identified tumors with biallelic BRCA and PALB2 alterations while most ATM- and CDK12-altered APCs had higher RAD51 foci levels. Overall, APCs with homozygous BRCA2 deletion are exceptional responders; PALB2 biallelic loss and loss of ATM IHC expression associated with clinical benefit. Significance: Not all APCs with DNA repair defects derive similar benefit from PARP inhibition. Most benefit was seen among patients with BRCA2 homozygous deletions, biallelic loss of PALB2, and loss of ATM protein. Loss of RAD51 foci, evaluating homologous recombination repair function, was found primarily in tumors with biallelic BRCA1/2 and PALB2 alterations. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2659


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis