Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC (RATIONALE 304): A Randomized Phase 3 Trial

Shun Lü(Shanghai Chest Hospital), Jie Wang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Yan Yu(Harbin Medical University), Xinmin Yu(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Yanping Hu(Hubei Cancer Hospital), Xinghao Ai(Shanghai Chest Hospital), Zhiyong Ma(Zhengzhou University), Xingya Li(First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University), Wu Zhuang(Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital), Yunpeng Liu(First Hospital of China Medical University), Weidong Li(Guangzhou Medical University), Jiuwei Cui(Jilin University), Dong Wang(Army Medical University), Wangjun Liao(Nanfang Hospital), Jianying Zhou(Zhejiang University), Zhehai Wang(Shandong Tumor Hospital), Yuping Sun(Jinan Central Hospital), Xiusong Qiu(BeiGene (China)), Jie Gao(BeiGene (China)), Yuanyuan Bao(BeiGene (China)), Liang Liang(BeiGene (China)), Mengzhao Wang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College)
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
May 23, 2021
Cited by 273Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody, was specifically engineered to minimize FcɣR macrophage binding to abrogate antibody-dependent phagocytosis. Compared with chemotherapy alone, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy may improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC (nsq-NSCLC). METHODS: In this open-label phase 3 trial (RATIONALE 304; NCT03663205), patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV nsq-NSCLC were randomized (2:1) to receive either arm A: tislelizumab plus platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) and pemetrexed every 3 weeks (Q3Ws) or arm B: platinum and pemetrexed alone Q3W during induction treatment, followed by intravenous maintenance pemetrexed Q3W. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee; clinical response and safety and tolerability were secondary end points. RESULTS: Overall, 332 patients (n = 222 [A]; n = 110 [B]) received treatment. With a median study follow-up of 9.8 months, PFS was significantly longer with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone (median PFS: 9.7 versus 7.6 mo; hazard ratio = 0.645 [95% confidence interval: 0.462-0.902], p = 0.0044). In addition, response rates were higher and response duration was longer with combination therapy versus chemotherapy alone. Hematologic adverse events (AEs) were common in both treatment arms; the most reported AEs were grades 1 to 2 in severity. The most common grade greater than or equal to 3 AEs were associated with chemotherapy and included neutropenia (44.6% [A]; 35.5% [B]) and leukopenia (21.6% [A]; 14.5% [B]). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of tislelizumab to chemotherapy resulted in significantly prolonged PFS, higher response rates, and longer response duration compared with chemotherapy alone, identifying a new potential option for first-line treatment of advanced nsq-NSCLC irrespective of disease stage.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis