APOSTEL 2.0 Recommendations for Reporting Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Studies

Aykut Aytulun(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Andrés Cruz-Herranz(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Orhan Aktaş(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Laura J. Balcer(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Lisanne J. Balk(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Piero Barboni(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Augusto Azuara‐Blanco(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Peter A. Calabresi(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Fiona Costello(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Delia Cabrera DeBuc(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Nicolas Feltgen(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Robert P. Finger(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Jette Lautrup Frederiksen(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Elliot M. Frohman(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Teresa C. Frohman(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), David F. Garway‐Heath(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Iñigo Gabilondo(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Jennifer Graves(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Ari Green(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Hans-Peter Hartung(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Joachim Havla(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Frank G. Holz(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Jaime Imitola(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Rachel Kenney(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Alexander Klistorner(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Benjamin Knier(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Thomas Korn(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Scott Kolbe(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Julia Krämer(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Wolf A. Lagrèze(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Letizia Leocani(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Oliver Maier(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Elena H. Martínez‐Lapiscina(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Sven G. Meuth(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Olivier Outteryck(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Friedemann Paul(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Axel Petzold(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Gorm Pihl-Jensen(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Jana Lízrová Preiningerová(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Gema Rebolleda(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Marius Ringelstein(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Shiv Saidha(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Sven Schippling(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Joel S. Schuman(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Robert C. Sergott(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Ahmed Toosy(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Pablo Villoslada(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Sebastián Wolf(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), E. Ann Yeh(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Patrick Yu‐Wai‐Man(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Hanna Zimmermann(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Alexander U. Brandt(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Philipp Albrecht(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf)
Neurology
April 29, 2021
Cited by 218Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To update the consensus recommendations for reporting of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) study results, thus revising the previously published Advised Protocol for OCT Study Terminology and Elements (APOSTEL) recommendations. METHODS: To identify studies reporting quantitative OCT results, we performed a PubMed search for the terms "quantitative" and "optical coherence tomography" from 2015 to 2017. Corresponding authors of the identified publications were invited to provide feedback on the initial APOSTEL recommendations via online surveys following the principle of a modified Delphi method. The results were evaluated and discussed by a panel of experts and changes to the initial recommendations were proposed. A final survey was recirculated among the corresponding authors to obtain a majority vote on the proposed changes. RESULTS: A total of 116 authors participated in the surveys, resulting in 15 suggestions, of which 12 were finally accepted and incorporated into an updated 9-point checklist. We harmonized the nomenclature of the outer retinal layers, added the exact area of measurement to the description of volume scans, and suggested reporting device-specific features. We advised to address potential bias in manual segmentation or manual correction of segmentation errors. References to specific reporting guidelines and room light conditions were removed. The participants' consensus with the recommendations increased from 80% for the previous APOSTEL version to greater than 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Delphi method resulted in an expert-led guideline (evidence Class III; Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations [GRADE] criteria) concerning study protocol, acquisition device, acquisition settings, scanning protocol, funduscopic imaging, postacquisition data selection, postacquisition analysis, nomenclature and abbreviations, and statistical approach. It will be essential to update these recommendations to new research and practices regularly.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis