Veliparib in Combination with Carboplatin and Etoposide in Patients with Treatment-Naïve Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Study

Lauren A. Byers(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Dmitry Bentsion(Ulyanovsk Regional Oncology Center), Steven Gans(Rijnstate Hospital), Konstantin Penkov(Euromedic), Choonhee Son(Dong-A University), Anne Sibille(University of Liège), Taofeek K. Owonikoko(Emory University), Harry J.M. Groen(University Medical Center Groningen), Carl M. Gay(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Junya Fujimoto(University of Nagasaki), Patricia M. de Groot(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Martin Dunbar(AbbVie (United States)), Kingston Kang(AbbVie (United States)), Lei He(AbbVie (United States)), Vasudha Sehgal(AbbVie (United States)), Jaimee Glasgow(AbbVie (United States)), Bruce Allen Bach(AbbVie (United States)), Peter Ellis(Juravinski Cancer Centre)
Clinical Cancer Research
May 4, 2021
Cited by 75Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of oral PARP inhibitor veliparib, plus carboplatin and etoposide in patients with treatment-naïve, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to veliparib [240 mg twice daily (BID) for 14 days] plus chemotherapy followed by veliparib maintenance (400 mg BID; veliparib throughout), veliparib plus chemotherapy followed by placebo (veliparib combination only), or placebo plus chemotherapy followed by placebo (control). Patients received 4-6 cycles of combination therapy, then maintenance until unacceptable toxicity/progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with veliparib throughout versus control. RESULTS: = 0.059]; median PFS was 5.8 and 5.6 months, respectively. There was a trend toward improved PFS with veliparib throughout versus control in SLFN11-positive patients (HR, 0.6; 80% CI, 0.36-0.97). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.1 versus 12.4 months in the veliparib throughout and control arms, respectively (HR, 1.43; 80% CI, 1.09-1.88). Grade 3/4 adverse events were experienced by 82%, 88%, and 68% of patients in the veliparib throughout, veliparib combination-only and control arms, most commonly hematologic. CONCLUSIONS: Veliparib plus platinum chemotherapy followed by veliparib maintenance demonstrated improved PFS as first-line treatment for ED-SCLC with an acceptable safety profile, but there was no corresponding benefit in OS. Further investigation is warranted to define the role of biomarkers in this setting.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis