Safety, Antitumor Activity, and Biomarker Analysis in a Phase I Trial of the Once-daily Wee1 Inhibitor Adavosertib (AZD1775) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Naoko Takebe(Center for Cancer Research), Abdul Rafeh Naqash(Center for Cancer Research), Geraldine O’Sullivan Coyne(Center for Cancer Research), Shivaani Kummar(Center for Cancer Research), T. Khanh(Center for Cancer Research), Ashley Bruns(Center for Cancer Research), Lamin Juwara(Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research), Jennifer Zlott(Center for Cancer Research), Larry Rubinstein(Center for Cancer Research), Richard Piekarz(Center for Cancer Research), Elad Sharon(Center for Cancer Research), Howard Streicher(Center for Cancer Research), Arjun Mittra(Center for Cancer Research), Sarah Miller(Center for Cancer Research), Jiuping Ji(Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research), Deborah Wilsker(Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research), Robert J. Kinders(Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research), Ralph E. Parchment(Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research), Li Chen(Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research), Ting-Chia Chang(Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research), Biswajit Das(Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research), Ganesh Mugundu(Massachusetts Medical Society), James H. Doroshow(Center for Cancer Research), Alice P. Chen(Center for Cancer Research)
Clinical Cancer Research
April 16, 2021
Cited by 68Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: The Wee1 kinase inhibitor adavosertib abrogates cell-cycle arrest, leading to cell death. Prior testing of twice-daily adavosertib in patients with advanced solid tumors determined the recommended phase II dose (RPh2D). Here, we report results for once-daily adavosertib. Patients and Methods: A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used, with adavosertib given once daily on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 in 21-day cycles. Molecular biomarkers of Wee1 activity, including tyrosine 15–phosphorylated Cdk1/2 (pY15-Cdk), were assessed in paired tumor biopsies. Whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing of remaining tumor tissue identified potential predictive biomarkers. Results: Among the 42 patients enrolled, the most common toxicities were gastrointestinal and hematologic; dose-limiting toxicities were grade 4 hematologic toxicity and grade 3 fatigue. The once-daily RPh2D was 300 mg. Six patients (14%) had confirmed partial responses: four ovarian, two endometrial. Adavosertib plasma exposures were similar to those from twice-daily dosing. On cycle 1 day 8 (pre-dose), tumor pY15-Cdk levels were higher than baseline in four of eight patients, suggesting target rebound during the day 5 to 8 dosing break. One patient who progressed rapidly had a tumor WEE1 mutation and potentially compensatory PKMYT1 overexpression. Baseline CCNE1 overexpression occurred in both of two responding patients, only one of whom had CCNE1 amplification, and in zero of three nonresponding patients. Conclusions: We determined the once-daily adavosertib RPh2D and observed activity in patients with ovarian or endometrial carcinoma, including two with baseline CCNE1 mRNA overexpression. Future studies will determine whether CCNE1 overexpression is a predictive biomarker for adavosertib.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis