Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant

Shabir A. Madhi(South African Medical Research Council), Vicky L. Baillie(South African Medical Research Council), Clare Cutland(MACOM (United States)), Merryn Voysey(MACOM (United States)), Anthonet Koen(South African Medical Research Council), Lee Fairlie(MACOM (United States)), Sherman D. Padayachee(MACOM (United States)), Keertan Dheda(MACOM (United States)), Shaun Barnabas(MACOM (United States)), Qasim Bhorat(MACOM (United States)), Carmen Briner(MACOM (United States)), Gaurav Kwatra(South African Medical Research Council), Khatija Ahmed(MACOM (United States)), Parvinder K. Aley(MACOM (United States)), Sutika Bhikha(South African Medical Research Council), Jinal N. Bhiman(MACOM (United States)), As’ad E. Bhorat(MACOM (United States)), Jeanine du Plessis(South African Medical Research Council), Aliasgar Esmail(MACOM (United States)), Marisa Groenewald(MACOM (United States)), Elizea Horne(MACOM (United States)), Shi-Hsia Hwa(MACOM (United States)), Aylin Jose(South African Medical Research Council), Teresa Lambe(MACOM (United States)), Matt Laubscher(South African Medical Research Council), Mookho Malahleha(MACOM (United States)), Masebole Masenya(MACOM (United States)), Mduduzi Masilela(MACOM (United States)), Shakeel McKenzie(South African Medical Research Council), Kgaogelo Molapo(MACOM (United States)), Andrew Moultrie(South African Medical Research Council), Suzette Oelofse(MACOM (United States)), Faeezah Patel(MACOM (United States)), Sureshnee Pillay(MACOM (United States)), Sarah Rhead(MACOM (United States)), Hylton Rodel(MACOM (United States)), Lindie Rossouw(MACOM (United States)), Carol Taoushanis(South African Medical Research Council), Houriiyah Tegally(MACOM (United States)), Asha Thombrayil(South African Medical Research Council), Samuel van Eck(MACOM (United States)), Constantinos Kurt Wibmer(MACOM (United States)), Nicholas M. Durham(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Elizabeth J. Kelly(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Tonya Villafana(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Sarah C. Gilbert(MACOM (United States)), Andrew J. Pollard(MACOM (United States)), Túlio de Oliveira(MACOM (United States)), Penny L. Moore(MACOM (United States)), Alex Sigal(MACOM (United States)), Alane Izu(South African Medical Research Council)
New England Journal of Medicine
March 16, 2021
Cited by 1,321Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation of the efficacy of the vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the B.1.351 (501Y.V2) variant first identified in South Africa. METHODS: viral particles or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) 21 to 35 days apart. Serum samples obtained from 25 participants after the second dose were tested by pseudovirus and live-virus neutralization assays against the original D614G virus and the B.1.351 variant. The primary end points were safety and efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic coronavirus 2019 illness (Covid-19) more than 14 days after the second dose. RESULTS: Between June 24 and November 9, 2020, we enrolled 2026 HIV-negative adults (median age, 30 years); 1010 and 1011 participants received at least one dose of placebo or vaccine, respectively. Both the pseudovirus and the live-virus neutralization assays showed greater resistance to the B.1.351 variant in serum samples obtained from vaccine recipients than in samples from placebo recipients. In the primary end-point analysis, mild-to-moderate Covid-19 developed in 23 of 717 placebo recipients (3.2%) and in 19 of 750 vaccine recipients (2.5%), for an efficacy of 21.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], -49.9 to 59.8). Among the 42 participants with Covid-19, 39 cases (95.1% of 41 with sequencing data) were caused by the B.1.351 variant; vaccine efficacy against this variant, analyzed as a secondary end point, was 10.4% (95% CI, -76.8 to 54.8). The incidence of serious adverse events was balanced between the vaccine and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine did not show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04444674; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR202006922165132).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis