Screening for Lung Cancer

US Preventive Services Task Force(Virginia Commonwealth University), Alex H. Krist(Northwell Health), Karina W. Davidson(Northwell Health), Carol M. Mangione(Harvard University), Michael J. Barry(Harvard University), Michael D. Cabana(Oregon Health & Science University), Aaron B. Caughey(Oregon Health & Science University), Esa M. Davis(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Katrina E Donahue(University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Chyke A. Doubeni(Mayo Clinic), Martha Kubik(George Mason University), C. Seth Landefeld(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Li Li(University of Virginia), Gbenga Ogedegbe(New York University), Douglas K Owens(University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School), Lori Pbert(University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School), Michael Silverstein(University of Missouri), James Stevermer(University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa), Chien‐Wen Tseng(University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa), John B. Wong(Tufts University)
JAMA
March 9, 2021
Cited by 1,695Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in the US. In 2020, an estimated 228 820 persons were diagnosed with lung cancer, and 135 720 persons died of the disease. The most important risk factor for lung cancer is smoking. Increasing age is also a risk factor for lung cancer. Lung cancer has a generally poor prognosis, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 20.5%. However, early-stage lung cancer has a better prognosis and is more amenable to treatment. OBJECTIVE: To update its 2013 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review on the accuracy of screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and on the benefits and harms of screening for lung cancer and commissioned a collaborative modeling study to provide information about the optimum age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal screening interval, and the relative benefits and harms of different screening strategies compared with modified versions of multivariate risk prediction models. POPULATION: This recommendation statement applies to adults aged 50 to 80 years who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. EVIDENCE ASSESSMENT: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT has a moderate net benefit in persons at high risk of lung cancer based on age, total cumulative exposure to tobacco smoke, and years since quitting smoking. RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF recommends annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT in adults aged 50 to 80 years who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. Screening should be discontinued once a person has not smoked for 15 years or develops a health problem that substantially limits life expectancy or the ability or willingness to have curative lung surgery. (B recommendation) This recommendation replaces the 2013 USPSTF statement that recommended annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT in adults aged 55 to 80 years who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years.


Related Papers

Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
Denise R Aberle, Amanda M Adams, Christine D Berg et al.|New England Journal of Medicine|2011|10.9k
Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Virginia A. Moyer, on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*|Annals of Internal Medicine|2013|2.6k