Nivolumab and Ipilimumab as Maintenance Therapy in Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 451

Taofeek K. Owonikoko(Emory University), Keunchil Park(Samsung Medical Center), Ramaswamy Govindan(Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center), Neal Ready(Duke Medical Center), Martin Reck(German Center for Lung Research), Solange Peters(University of Lausanne), Shaker R. Dakhil(Cancer Center of Kansas), Alejandro Navarro(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Jerónimo Rafael Rodríguez‐Cid(Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias), Michael Schenker, Jong Seok Lee(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Vanesa Gutiérrez(Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga), Ivor Percent(Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute), Daniel Morgensztern(Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center), Carlos H. Barrios(Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul), Laurent Greillier(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Sofia Baka(Interbalkan Medical Center), Miten Patel(Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute), Wen Lin(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Giovanni Selvaggi(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Christine Baudelet(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Jonathan Baden(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Dimple Pandya(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Parul Doshi(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Hye Ryun Kim(Yonsei University)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
March 8, 2021
Cited by 263Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: In extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), response rates to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are robust, but responses lack durability. CheckMate 451, a double-blind phase III trial, evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy for ED-SCLC. METHODS: Patients with ED-SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no progression after ≤ 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 12 weeks followed by nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo for ≤ 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. Secondary end points were hierarchically tested. RESULTS: 9.6 months). The HR for OS with nivolumab versus placebo was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02); the median OS for nivolumab was 10.4 months. Progression-free survival HRs versus placebo were 0.72 for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87) and 0.67 for nivolumab (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). A trend toward OS benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in patients with tumor mutational burden ≥ 13 mutations per megabase. Rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were nivolumab plus ipilimumab (52.2%), nivolumab (11.5%), and placebo (8.4%). CONCLUSION: Maintenance therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not prolong OS for patients with ED-SCLC who did not progress on first-line chemotherapy. There were no new safety signals.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis