More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sandra López‐León(Novartis (United States)), Talía Wegman-Ostrosky(Instituto Nacional de Cancerología), Carol Perelman(Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), Rosalinda Sepúlveda(Harvard University), Paulina A. Rebolledo(Emory University), Angélica Cuapio(Karolinska Institutet), Sonia Villapol(Houston Methodist)
Scientific Reports
August 9, 2021
Cited by 2,481Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

COVID-19 can involve persistence, sequelae, and other medical complications that last weeks to months after initial recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify studies assessing the long-term effects of COVID-19. LitCOVID and Embase were searched to identify articles with original data published before the 1st of January 2021, with a minimum of 100 patients. For effects reported in two or more studies, meta-analyses using a random-effects model were performed using the MetaXL software to estimate the pooled prevalence with 95% CI. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A total of 18,251 publications were identified, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of 55 long-term effects was estimated, 21 meta-analyses were performed, and 47,910 patients were included (age 17-87 years). The included studies defined long-COVID as ranging from 14 to 110 days post-viral infection. It was estimated that 80% of the infected patients with SARS-CoV-2 developed one or more long-term symptoms. The five most common symptoms were fatigue (58%), headache (44%), attention disorder (27%), hair loss (25%), and dyspnea (24%). Multi-disciplinary teams are crucial to developing preventive measures, rehabilitation techniques, and clinical management strategies with whole-patient perspectives designed to address long COVID-19 care.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis