Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling

Karthik Kashinath(National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center), Mohamed Elhafiz Mustafa(National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center), Adrian Albert(National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center), Jinlong Wu(California Institute of Technology), Chung-Hsiang Jiang(National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center), Soheil Esmaeilzadeh(Stanford University), Kamyar Azizzadenesheli(Purdue University West Lafayette), Rui Wang(University of California San Diego), Ashesh Chattopadhyay(National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center), Aakanksha Singh(National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center), A. Manepalli(National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center), Dragos B. Chirila(Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung), Rose Yu(University of California San Diego), Robin Walters(Northeastern University), Brian White(Littelfuse (United States)), Heng Xiao(Virginia Tech), Hamdi A. Tchelepi(Stanford University), Philip Marcus(University of California, Berkeley), Anima Anandkumar(California Institute of Technology), Pedram Hassanzadeh(Rice University), Prabhat(National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center)
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
February 15, 2021
Cited by 625

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) provides novel and powerful ways of accurately and efficiently recognizing complex patterns, emulating nonlinear dynamics, and predicting the spatio-temporal evolution of weather and climate processes. Off-the-shelf ML models, however, do not necessarily obey the fundamental governing laws of physical systems, nor do they generalize well to scenarios on which they have not been trained. We survey systematic approaches to incorporating physics and domain knowledge into ML models and distill these approaches into broad categories. Through 10 case studies, we show how these approaches have been used successfully for emulating, downscaling, and forecasting weather and climate processes. The accomplishments of these studies include greater physical consistency, reduced training time, improved data efficiency, and better generalization. Finally, we synthesize the lessons learned and identify scientific, diagnostic, computational, and resource challenges for developing truly robust and reliable physics-informed ML models for weather and climate processes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Machine learning for weather and climate modelling'.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis