Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Robert J. Motzer(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), B. Yа. Alekseev(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Sun Young Rha(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Camillo Porta(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Masatoshi Eto(Kyushu University), Thomas Powles(Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust), Viktor Grünwald(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Thomas E. Hutson(Texas Oncology), Evgeny Kopyltsov(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), María José Méndez-Vidal(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Vadim Kozlov(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Anna Alyasova(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Sung‐Hoo Hong(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Anil Kapoor(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Teresa Alonso Gordoa(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Jaime R. Merchan(University of Miami), Eric Winquist(Western University), Pablo Maroto(Hospital de Sant Pau), Jeffrey C. Goh(The University of Queensland), Miso Kim(Seoul National University Hospital), Howard Gurney(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Vijay Patel(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Avivit Peer(Rambam Health Care Campus), Giuseppe Procopio(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Toshio Takagi(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Bohuslav Melichar(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Frédéric Rolland(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Ugo De Giorgi(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Shirley Wong(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Jens Bedke(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Manuela Schmidinger(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Corina E. Dutcus(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Alan D. Smith(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Lea Dutta(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Kalgi Mody(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Rodolfo F. Perini(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Dongyuan Xing(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"), Toni K. Choueiri(Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center")
New England Journal of Medicine
February 13, 2021
Cited by 1,741Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab or everolimus has activity against advanced renal cell carcinoma. The efficacy of these regimens as compared with that of sunitinib is unclear. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1:1 ratio) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and no previous systemic therapy to receive lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (18 mg orally once daily) plus everolimus (5 mg orally once daily), or sunitinib (50 mg orally once daily, alternating 4 weeks receiving treatment and 2 weeks without treatment). The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Overall survival and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1069 patients were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (355 patients), lenvatinib plus everolimus (357), or sunitinib (357). Progression-free survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with sunitinib (median, 23.9 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.49; P<0.001) and was longer with lenvatinib plus everolimus than with sunitinib (median, 14.7 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.80; P<0.001). Overall survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.88; P = 0.005) but was not longer with lenvatinib plus everolimus than with sunitinib (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.50; P = 0.30). Grade 3 or higher adverse events emerged or worsened during treatment in 82.4% of the patients who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, 83.1% of those who received lenvatinib plus everolimus, and 71.8% of those who received sunitinib. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurring in at least 10% of the patients in any group included hypertension, diarrhea, and elevated lipase levels. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than sunitinib. (Funded by Eisai and Merck Sharp and Dohme; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02811861.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis