Anesthetics or anesthetic techniques and cancer surgical outcomes: a possible link

Azeem Alam(Chelsea and Westminster Hospital), Sanketh Rampes(Chelsea and Westminster Hospital), Sonam Patel(Chelsea and Westminster Hospital), Zac Hana(Chelsea and Westminster Hospital), Daqing Ma(Chelsea and Westminster Hospital)
Korean journal of anesthesiology
February 18, 2021
Cited by 35Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

As of 2018 cancer is responsible for almost 9.6 million deaths annually and, with an aging population, the incidence of cancer is expected to continue to rise. Surgery is an important treatment modality for patients with solid organ cancers. It has been postulated that, due to potentially overlapping processes underlying the development of malignancy and the therapeutic pathways of various anesthetic agents, the choice of anesthetic type and method of administration may affect post-operative outcomes in patients with cancer. This is a literature review of the most recent evidence extracted from various databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane, as well as journals and book reference lists. The review highlights the pathophysiological processes underpinning cancer development and the molecular actions of anesthetic agents, pre-clinical and retrospective studies investigating cancer and anesthetics, as well as ongoing clinical trials. Overall, there are conflicting results regarding the impact of regional vs. general anesthesia on cancer recurrence, whilst the majority of data suggest a benefit of the use of intravenous propofol over inhalational volatile anesthetics. The biological changes associated with the surgical inflammatory response offer a unique opportunity to intervene to counteract any potentially cancer-promoting effects.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis