Encorafenib Plus Cetuximab as a New Standard of Care for Previously Treated <i>BRAF</i> V600E–Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Updated Survival Results and Subgroup Analyses from the BEACON Study

Josep Tabernero(Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya), Axel Grothey(West Cancer Center), Eric Van Cutsem(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Rona Yaeger(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Harpreet Wasan(Hammersmith Hospital), Takayuki Yoshino(National Cancer Center Hospital East), Jayesh Desai(The Royal Melbourne Hospital), Fortunato Ciardiello(University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"), Fotios Loupakis(Istituto Oncologico Veneto), Yong Sang Hong(Asan Medical Center), Neeltje Steeghs(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Tormod Kyrre Guren(Oslo University Hospital), Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau(Sarah Cannon Research Institute), Pilar García‐Alfonso(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Elena Élez(Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya), Ashwin Gollerkeri(Pfizer (United States)), Kati Maharry(Pfizer (United States)), Janna Christy‐Bittel(Pfizer (United States)), Scott Kopetz(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
January 27, 2021
Cited by 537Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE BEACON CRC evaluated encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib versus investigators' choice of irinotecan or FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in patients with BRAFV600E–mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), after progression on 1-2 prior regimens. In the previously reported primary analysis, encorafenib, binimetinib plus cetuximab (ENCO/BINI/CETUX; triplet) and encorafenib plus cetuximab (ENCO/CETUX; doublet) regimens improved overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR; by blinded central review) versus standard of care. The purpose of this analysis was to report updated efficacy and safety data. METHODS In this open-label, phase III trial, 665 patients with BRAF V600E–mutant mCRC were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive triplet, doublet, or control. Primary end points were OS and independently reviewed ORR comparing triplet to control. OS for doublet versus control was a key secondary end point. Updated analyses include 6 months of additional follow-up and ORR for all randomized patients. RESULTS Patients received triplet (n = 224), doublet (n = 220), or control (n = 221). Median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 10.8) for triplet and 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.1) for control (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.75]). Median OS for doublet was 9.3 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 11.3) (HR v control, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.77]). Confirmed ORR was 26.8% (95% CI, 21.1% to 33.1%) for triplet, 19.5% (95% CI, 14.5% to 25.4%) for doublet, and 1.8% (95% CI, 0.5% to 4.6%) for control. Adverse events were consistent with the prior primary analysis, with grade ≥ 3 adverse events in 65.8%, 57.4%, and 64.2% for triplet, doublet, and control, respectively. CONCLUSION In the BEACON CRC study, encorafenib plus cetuximab improved OS, ORR, and progression-free survival in previously treated patients in the metastatic setting compared with standard chemotherapy. Based on the primary and updated analyses, encorafenib plus cetuximab is a new standard care regimen for previously treated patients with BRAF V600E mCRC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis