Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A double-blind, phase 1/2a, randomized controlled trial

Giacomo Lanzoni(University of Miami), Elina Linetsky(University of Miami), Diego Correa(University of Miami), Shari Messinger(University of Miami), Roger A. Alvarez(University of Miami), Dimitrios Kouroupis(University of Miami), Ana Alvarez Gil(University of Miami), Raffaella Poggioli(University of Miami), Phillip Ruiz(University of Miami), Antonio Marttos(University of Miami), Khemraj Hirani(University of Miami), Crystal A. Bell(University of Miami), Halina Kusack(University of Miami), Lisa Rafkin(University of Miami), David A. Baidal(University of Miami), Andrew Pastewski(Jackson Health System), Kunal Gawri(University of Miami), Clarissa Leñero(University of Miami), Alejandro Mantero(University of Miami), Sarah Wishnek Metalonis(University of Miami), Xiaojing Wang(University of Miami), Luis Roque(University of Miami), Burlett Masters(University of Miami), Norma S. Kenyon(University of Miami), Enrique Ginzburg(University of Miami), Xiumin Xu(University of Miami), Ming Jen Tan(Hainan Medical University), Arnold I. Caplan(Case Western Reserve University), Marilyn K. Glassberg(University of Arizona), Rodolfo Alejandro(University of Miami), Camillo Ricordi(University of Miami)
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
January 5, 2021
Cited by 431Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in COVID-19 is associated with high mortality. Mesenchymal stem cells are known to exert immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects and could yield beneficial effects in COVID-19 ARDS. The objective of this study was to determine safety and explore efficacy of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (UC-MSC) infusions in subjects with COVID-19 ARDS. A double-blind, phase 1/2a, randomized, controlled trial was performed. Randomization and stratification by ARDS severity was used to foster balance among groups. All subjects were analyzed under intention to treat design. Twenty-four subjects were randomized 1:1 to either UC-MSC treatment (n = 12) or the control group (n = 12). Subjects in the UC-MSC treatment group received two intravenous infusions (at day 0 and 3) of 100 ± 20 × 106 UC-MSCs; controls received two infusions of vehicle solution. Both groups received best standard of care. Primary endpoint was safety (adverse events [AEs]) within 6 hours; cardiac arrest or death within 24 hours postinfusion). Secondary endpoints included patient survival at 31 days after the first infusion and time to recovery. No difference was observed between groups in infusion-associated AEs. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed related to UC-MSC infusions. UC-MSC infusions in COVID-19 ARDS were found to be safe. Inflammatory cytokines were significantly decreased in UC-MSC-treated subjects at day 6. Treatment was associated with significantly improved patient survival (91% vs 42%, P = .015), SAE-free survival (P = .008), and time to recovery (P = .03). UC-MSC infusions are safe and could be beneficial in treating subjects with COVID-19 ARDS.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis