Analysis of viral load in different specimen types and serum antibody levels of COVID-19 patients

Ling Li(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Chianru Tan(Tsinghua University), Jia Zeng(Second Military Medical University), Chen Luo(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Shi Hu(Second Military Medical University), Yanke Peng(Tsinghua University), Wenjuan Li(Anhui Medical University), Zhixiong Xie(Hubei Provincial Women and Children's Hospital), Yueming Ling(The 180th Hospital of PLA), Xuejun Zhang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), E. Deng(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Haixia Xu(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Jue Wang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Yudi Xie(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Yaling Zhou(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Wei Zhang(Second Military Medical University), Yong Guo(Tsinghua University), Zhong Liu(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College)
Journal of Translational Medicine
January 7, 2021
Cited by 53Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has caused a global pandemic and the death toll is increasing. However, there is no definitive information regarding the type of clinical specimens that is the best for SARS-CoV-2 detection, the antibody levels in patients with different duration of disease, and the relationship between antibody level and viral load. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs, anal swabs, saliva, blood, and urine specimens were collected from patients with a course of disease ranging from 7 to 69 days. Viral load in different specimen types was measured using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Meanwhile, anti-nucleocapsid protein (anti-N) IgM and IgG antibodies and anti-spike protein receptor-binding domain (anti-S-RBD) IgG antibody in all serum samples were tested using ELISA. RESULTS: The positive detection rate in nasopharyngeal swab was the highest (54.05%), followed by anal swab (24.32%), and the positive detection rate in saliva, blood, and urine was 16.22%, 10.81%, and 5.41%, respectively. However, some patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs had other specimens tested positive. There was no significant correlation between antibody level and days after symptoms onset or viral load. CONCLUSIONS: Other specimens could be positive in patients with negative nasopharyngeal swabs, suggesting that for patients in the recovery period, specimens other than nasopharyngeal swabs should also be tested to avoid false negative results, and anal swabs are recommended. The antibody level had no correlation with days after symptoms onset or the viral load of nasopharyngeal swabs, suggesting that the antibody level may also be affected by other factors.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis