Structural and mechanistic basis of the EMC-dependent biogenesis of distinct transmembrane clients

Lakshmi E. Miller-Vedam(University of California, San Francisco), Bastian Bräuning(Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry), Katerina D. Popova(University of California, San Francisco), Nicole T Schirle Oakdale(University of California, San Francisco), Jessica L. Bonnar(University of California, San Francisco), J. Rajan Prabu(Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry), Elizabeth A. Boydston(University of California, San Francisco), Natalia Sevillano(University of California, San Francisco), Matthew J. Shurtleff(University of California, San Francisco), Robert M. Stroud(University of California, San Francisco), Charles S. Craik(University of California, San Francisco), Brenda A. Schulman(Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry), Adam Frost(University of California, San Francisco), Jonathan S. Weissman(Howard Hughes Medical Institute)
eLife
November 25, 2020
Cited by 90Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Membrane protein biogenesis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is complex and failure-prone. The ER membrane protein complex (EMC), comprising eight conserved subunits, has emerged as a central player in this process. Yet, we have limited understanding of how EMC enables insertion and integrity of diverse clients, from tail-anchored to polytopic transmembrane proteins. Here, yeast and human EMC cryo-EM structures reveal conserved intricate assemblies and human-specific features associated with pathologies. Structure-based functional studies distinguish between two separable EMC activities, as an insertase regulating tail-anchored protein levels and a broader role in polytopic membrane protein biogenesis. These depend on mechanistically coupled yet spatially distinct regions including two lipid-accessible membrane cavities which confer client-specific regulation, and a non-insertase EMC function mediated by the EMC lumenal domain. Our studies illuminate the structural and mechanistic basis of EMC's multifunctionality and point to its role in differentially regulating the biogenesis of distinct client protein classes.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis