Management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning

Bruno Mégarbane(Inserm), M. Oberlin(EM Strasbourg Business School), Jean‐Claude Alvarez(Inserm), Frédéric Balen(Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées), Sébastien Beaune(Inserm), R. Bédry(Hôpital Pellegrin), Anthony Chauvin(Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris), I. Claudet(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse), Vincent Danel(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble), Guillaume Debaty(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Arnaud Delahaye, Nicolas Deye(Inserm), Jean‐Michel Gaulier(Université de Lille), Francis Grossenbacher(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims), Philippe Hantson(Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc), Frédéric Jacobs(Université Paris-Sud), Karim Jaffal(Inserm), Magali Labadie(Sciences Po Bordeaux), Laurence Labat(Inserm), Jérôme Langrand(Inserm), Frédéric Lapostolle(Inserm), Philippe Le Conte(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes), Maxime Maignan(Inserm), Patrick Nisse(Université de Lille), P Sauder(Université de Strasbourg), Christine Tournoud(Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy), Dominique Vodovar(Inserm), Sébastian Voicu(Inserm), Pierre‐Géraud Claret(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes), Charles Cerf(Hôpital Foch)
Annals of Intensive Care
January 1, 2020
Cited by 89Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Background Poisoning is one of the leading causes of admission to the emergency department and intensive care unit. A large number of epidemiological changes have occurred over the last years such as the exponential growth of new synthetic psychoactive substances. Major progress has also been made in analytical screening and assays, enabling the clinicians to rapidly obtain a definite diagnosis. Methods A committee composed of 30 experts from five scientific societies, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF), the Société Française de Médecine d’Urgence (SFMU), the Société de Toxicologie Clinique (STC), the Société Française de Toxicologie Analytique (SFTA) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d’Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) evaluated eight fields: (1) severity assessment and initial triage; (2) diagnostic approach and role of toxicological analyses; (3) supportive care; (4) decontamination; (5) elimination enhancement; (6) place of antidotes; (7) specificities related to recreational drug poisoning; and (8) characteristics of cardiotoxicant poisoning. Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Analysis of the literature and formulation of recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE ® methodology. Results The SRLF-SFMU guideline panel provided 41 statements concerning the management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning. Ethanol and chemical poisoning were excluded from the scope of these recommendations. After two rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong consensus was reached for all recommendations. Six of these recommendations had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and six had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). Twenty-nine recommendations were in the form of expert opinion recommendations due to the low evidences in the literature. Conclusions The experts reached a substantial consensus for several strong recommendations for optimal management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning, mainly regarding the conditions and effectiveness of naloxone and N -acetylcystein as antidotes to treat opioid and acetaminophen poisoning, respectively.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis